In Arizona, the statute of limitations is 7 years. 7 + 2004 = 2011. The DA in that case said he didn’t have enough evidence to go to trial.
Any of the women in long term relationships could have gotten proof. If they were drugged and raped, they could have gone to the cops and the DNA and drug tests would have put Cosby behind bars. They did not.
My thoughts on Clinton were posted on FR back in 98 & 99. What are your thoughts on Anita Hill?
What does the statute of limitations have to do with a case that is already settled? The two police reports that we know of were filed long before any statute of limitations and the lawsuit over the 2004 drugging and raping was settled in 2006.
The evidence against Cosby is mountains larger than the rape accusation against Clinton that surfaced during Paula Jones’s lawsuit.
Were you ranting and raving and being so slippery and dishonestly desperate defending Clinton against Juanita Broaddrick and freepers discussing it?
December 18, 2006 Vol. 66 No. 25
Bill Cosby Under Fire By Alex Tresniowski
The Comedian Settles a Case Accusing Him of Sexual Abuse—but Other Women Make Similar Claims
What Cosby never mentioned was the civil lawsuit he settled just two days earlier with Andrea Constand, 32, a former Temple University employee who claimed Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted her in his Philadelphia-area mansion in 2004. Constand’s lawyers Dolores Troiani and Bebe Kivitz ended up with 13 witnesses, most referred to in court documents as “Jane Does,” who came forward voluntarily with strikingly similar claims of drugging and or abuse by Cosby. Terms of the settlement, reached before any of the women could testify, were not disclosed. But PEOPLE reporters have interviewed five of the women and share three of their stories now.