Posted on 11/21/2014 7:49:40 PM PST by Steelfish
N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Mr. JOE ARPAIO, Elected SHERIFF of Maricopa County, State of Arizona 550 West Jackson Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 Plaintiff, v. The Honorable BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his professional capacity as President of the United States of America 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20500 and The Honorable JEH JOHNSON, individually and in his professional capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security 12th & C Street SW Washington, D.C. 20024 and The Honorable LEON RODRIQUEZ, individually and in his professional capacity as Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 12th & C Street SW Washington, D.C. 20024 and The Honorable ERIC HOLDER, JR., individually and in his professional capacity as U.S. Attorney General 555 Fourth St. NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Defendants. CIVIL COMPLAINT Civil Action No. _______ Case 1:14-cv-01966 Document 1 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 19
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Wait a sec, wait a sec... Is he going to file it or go on tour to announce he’s going to file and let us know what’s in it if we show up at one of his town hall meetings that cost $25 to listen to him tell us he can’t say much more for fear of a lawsuit? Sorry but I had the chance to listen to him awhile back and I wasn’t impressed by the man. I thought he would be so much different but I can almost see how he could have given Al Capone a run for his money back in the day if he’d gone the other way...
He’s already duped us already several times. Not buying it this time...
If you have a problem Downloading the complaint and exhibits, look for it listed on this site.
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org
Its a good guess that this will be dismissed either because Arpaio does not have standing to sue, or that he has not been harmed by Obama’s Order (yet), or both.
Oh yeah, he filed it. I just pulled it up on PACER.
I remember his weekly birther press conferences. LOL
Oh yeah, he filed it. I just pulled it up on PACER.
I got access to that system too. Does it have the original petition up on there already?
I’m shocked. I guess tickets go on sale next Friday eh?
No harm means no standing.
Governors and State Attorney Generals have standing.
Yeah Complaint filed, Summons issued for all defendants and a Standing Order (regarding procedure, etc.). I’d buy a ticket.
“Hes already duped us already several times. Not buying it this time...”
He hasn’t duped anyone. If you paid any attention to the case then you would know better. Just because you didn’t get what you want when you want it then you attack the investigators who have tried everything to get the message tried. It is so childish and frankly I don’t blame them for standing back and saying why am I doing this so that people like you can attack our character. Your comment is ignorant.
> He hasnt duped anyone. If you paid any attention to the case then you would know better. Just because you didnt get what you want when you want it then you attack the investigators who have tried everything to get the message tried. It is so childish and frankly I dont blame them for standing back and saying why am I doing this so that people like you can attack our character. Your comment is ignorant.
We he’s dragged the cart without a wheel for several years now and made promises but not delivered. I don’t think I’m being unreasonable at all.
I’m an investigator so I know the diligence required to conduct a very complex investigations that have taken me years to solve and complete. My issue is that he never should never had said he was going to release info within a certain time frame if he wasn’t going to make good on his promise. It hasn’t just been once either.
He’s only had two conferences.
*
I am relieved that citizens have no standing. The courts just want us to bow before the “dear leader”... I will have to practice bowing and scraping before “Barrack the First”..
Plaintiff Joe Arpaio is adversely affected and harmed in his offices finances, workload, and interference with the conduct of his duties, by the failure of the executive branch to enforce existing immigration laws, but has been severely affected by increases in the influx of illegal aliens motivated by Defendant Obamas policies of offering amnesty. In this regard, as detailed in Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 to this Complaint which is incorporated herein for reference, Plaintiff Arpaio has been severely affected and damaged by Defendant Obamas release of criminal aliens onto the streets of Maricopa County, Arizona. This prior damage will be severely increased by virtue of Defendant Obamas Executive Order of November 20, 2014, which is at issue. 28.
Thus, the Office of the Sheriff has been directly harmed and impacted adversely by Obamas DACA program and will be similarly harmed by his new Executive Order effectively granting amnesty to illegal aliens. 29.
Defendant Obamas past promises of amnesty and his DACA amnesty have directly burdened and interfered with the operations of the Sheriffs Office, and Defendant Obamas new amnesty program will greatly increase the burden and disruption of the Sheriffs duties.
30. First, experience has proven as an empirical fact that millions more illegal aliens will be attracted into the border states of the United States, regardless of the specific details. 31.
Second, the experiences and records of the Sheriffs office show that many illegal aliens as distinct from law- abiding Hispanic Americans are repeat offenders, such that Case 1:14-cv-01966 Document 1 Filed 11/20/14 Page 9 of 19 10
No he is just like us. He believed that in justice system his case would be heard. He had no idea to what lengths the justice system would go to cover everything up. He is just as demoralized by it all as the rest of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.