Posted on 11/17/2014 10:47:41 AM PST by dead
Protesters are gathering in support of Michael Brown in and around St. Louis as they nervously await what many believe will be an inevitable no-indictment vote in the coming days by a grand jury for the officer who shot him.
Demonstrators held a 'die-in' Sunday to mark 100 days since the unarmed Ferguson, Missouri teen was killed. They also convened to, among other things, prepare for the imminent court decision by issuing 'rules of engagement' for police there for crowd control, the New York Times reports.
Many of the the high-profile protesters met with President Obama and discussed the matter November 5, including Reverend Al Sharpton. It was a meeting the Gateway Pundit notes was not included on the president's daily schedule.
Sharpton told the Times that Obama urged the group to 'stay on course.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
As it should be. Officer was only doing his job.
Is it possible that the Grand Jury might not indict because has a matter of fact, that the officer is not guilty.
More like community agitator.
“Obama & Sharpton will have dead & wounded on their hands.”
Like they both care....
In his mind, those miscreants are real people. Just like him.
Picture of Obama trying to calm the mob and have them trust the rule of law? No? I didn’t think so. He is the community dis-organizer in chief only the community in this case is the USA herself.
If George Bush would have met with the KKK ahead of such a crisis, he would me impeached instantly! I have no voice anymore, I’ve screamed for too long!!’
Yes Blue, the man had no arms at the time.
That was the whole reason for the secret meeting:
1) Assure them, that at the federal level, they will be protected by the Department of "Just-Us".
2) Assure the protesters that the lawless Administration will "lean" on any prosecutor, DA, or other state pion through their MO Governor lackey, and other lickspittle liberal politicians.
LOL
Love the Ghost Busters ref there.
.Michael Brown had no arms but had assaulted the fixer and grabbed for the officer’s gun. Then Brown trie to leave the scene, when he turned and rushed the officer.
What would you have done? Honestly, what would you have done if someone had smashed in your face and tried to reach for your gun? Would you have let the guy walk away?
Isn’t this EXACTLY what the whole civil rights movement was about?
- The folks of color in Ferguson and elsewhere want BLOOD; they want a lynching - or else.
How convoluted is this???
Anti-US agitators are waiting to rush in and stir up trouble. In fact one already has: BHO.
Free Hash Browns at Mickey D’s!
By golly, you’re right!
I, too, do not recall having heard them repeat the ‘fact’ that he was “unarmed”, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over....
It’s not about Justice. It’s now about vengeance and retribution. The jubilant reaction of blacks to the OJ verdict made that clear.
It’s inevitable because it’s OBVIOUS that he’s not guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.