His politics is irrelevant to the charges.
Whether he is democrat or not, he is not the typical race baiter. He is well known for a cleaner variety of comedy. I have his comedy performances and he makes fun of people who reward themselves by getting so drunk they spend their weekend glued to a toilet — stuff like that. He is not the typical liberal.
Regardless, the man is innocent until proven guilty. The statute of limitations is important on these sorts of charges because the accused has a right to defend himself and to a presumption of innocence. There is no proving something like this all these years later.
The man was famous and well loved by all and did not need to force or drug women for sex. I’m sure he had plenty of willing partners available to him at all times. To believe these charges is to believe the absolute worst of him It just does not match his known character. The burden is on the accusers to prove and all these many years later that is impossible.
I think your reasoning for his defense is exactly how he gets away with it.
Predators are often those with the best possible reputations. They rely on these good reputations to help them get away with it and plant doubt in the direction of the accuser (who is often a real victim).
How many people didn’t believe that a Catholic priest would harm just one kid, much less dozens?
Wow
Just ignore his race baitjng diatribes that don’t fit your template and the 15 women who’ve accused him over the years
Because he’s famous and you like his comedy?
That’s illogical.
Men don’t rape because its their only means to get laid
Lord a mercy....Free Republic....ways entertaining