Posted on 10/22/2014 12:07:47 PM PDT by Rusty0604
making hiring people more expensive and burdensome is going to create jobs?
lol
Um... no.
Labor secretary obviously has the IQ of an ashtray.
Why is the cure for liberalism always more liberalism?
Welcome to Newspeak. Up is now down. Good is bad. Doing nothing is work.
I was looking for the satire tag. I guess our Labor Secretary is dumber than a bag of hammers.
So, to increase employment you just offer people a job where they get paid for not working. Boy, what a stroke of genius.
“In his speech, Perez also lobbied for a higher minimum wage, immigration reform, and labor unions.”
That about sums it up.
Yup. Liblogic. Less people working=more people working. Must be common core training kickin’ in. It’s not the answer that counts, it’s the journey it took to get to the answer. HUH?
Voila! The labor participation rate improves! Genius!
uhhh....the labor participation rate in Canada is higher because Stephen Harper can run rings around Obama when it comes to knowledge of economics. Not because of the additional benefit.
so.... Mooching
Liberals live in a fantasy land where none of their policies ever have negative effects.
Gotta hand it to a liberal....they’ll come up with some specious BS every time. Rain or shine. Just a labor version of the Broken Window fallacy.
Step 1. Collect the underpants.
Step 2. ##$%$@@^^*& ??
Step 3 Profit!
I guess I must have missed the satire alert.
If we limit the program to government numbskulls like him and make them promise they will never work ever again, we might actually come out ahead on this plan.
...because forcing businesses to pay people who aren’t working encourages them to hire more workers.
Help me, John Galt!
Another flaming idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.