Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/21/2014 11:46:32 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All

What say you?


2 posted on 10/21/2014 11:47:02 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I think he will face baseless charges in MO.


4 posted on 10/21/2014 11:48:18 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Recent forensic evidence and the conflicting "eye-witness" accounts along with the gentle giants prior record says Wilson is a free man.

His best bet is to get out of Ferguson ASAP and never come back.

If I were him I'd head to the Pacific for a while.

5 posted on 10/21/2014 11:48:38 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If there is an indictment EVERYONE ELSE should riot...


6 posted on 10/21/2014 11:49:51 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I think it will be an excuse for more violence.


7 posted on 10/21/2014 11:50:03 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

No bill but the grand jury has been told by the ‘powers-that-be’ to wait until the lynch mob in Ferguson loses interest and stops the ‘protests’.


9 posted on 10/21/2014 11:50:53 AM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Present.


11 posted on 10/21/2014 11:52:31 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I think he will get hit with some “Lesser Charges” that will amount to basically nothing. I feel the thought behind this will be to diffuse any potential angst in Ferguson.

Bottom line, they will riot no matter what the outcome is.


12 posted on 10/21/2014 11:52:46 AM PDT by Snark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The leaks are preparing us.


13 posted on 10/21/2014 11:53:53 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

In a sane world he would face no charges.

In the world today, upside down as it is, who knows.


15 posted on 10/21/2014 11:54:18 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I think the decision should be announced after Nov 5, after the election when it’s a good bit colder.


17 posted on 10/21/2014 11:55:50 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It ought to return a big nothing, but who can say with the insanity prevalent nowadays?


18 posted on 10/21/2014 11:55:56 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

They will either wait until the last few weeks of the election cycle in order to get people out or they will wait until the first heavy snowfall hits or really cold weather.


20 posted on 10/21/2014 11:56:14 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Wilson will get a medal and run for Governor.


25 posted on 10/21/2014 11:58:52 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

No charges


26 posted on 10/21/2014 11:59:16 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I think he will walk as he should, I also think they will release the grand jury results right before Nov4th to make sure the base is pissed and votes.


27 posted on 10/21/2014 11:59:23 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Not guilty

Anything else is just a "Well...let's just make him go to trial and let them figure it out"

Either call will produce a riot...cuz that's what the "I hate whitey" aka "Black Coalition" folks do in that town.

28 posted on 10/21/2014 11:59:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Depends on whether those “eyewitness” testimonies line up with forensics. If entry holes are blatantly inconsistent with claimed positioning (say, forearm entry holes would require arms be down instead of “surrendering”), then those testimonies can be discarded outright.

Remember, early on the “eyewitnesses” claimed he was shot in the back...


29 posted on 10/21/2014 12:00:27 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (You know what, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The jury will be presented with medical reports illustrating the damage done to the officer’s face, and will conclude that the (drug affected) 300 lb ‘youth’ had indeed provoked a fight requiring the use of deadly force.


32 posted on 10/21/2014 12:01:36 PM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The issue here is that the prosecutor could get an indictment, but probably doesn't think there's enough for a conviction.

Maybe they think it would be easier to deal with the protesters after a No Bill than to let this thing drag out even longer with a trial that would end in an acquittal.

From the few reports coming out of the Grand Jury, the prosecutor has been presenting witnesses that would exonerate Wilson; not usually the approach a prosecutor takes.

It seems like an indictment gives the prosecutor some leverage in getting a plea bargain, but I doubt Wilson would make any deal. He has to know, as does his lawyer, that a conviction with what little evidence they have is almost impossible.

So, I think they're mostly trying to avoid a trial and acquittal. No easy way out for the county prosecutor, but I think they're looking for the quickest way out.

35 posted on 10/21/2014 12:06:53 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson