Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enterovirus D68 And Influenza Far More Dangerous Than Ebola In U.S., Say Top Physicians
Forbes ^ | 10/09/2014 | David Kroll

Posted on 10/09/2014 10:35:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: SeekAndFind

Maybe at this moment. That may quickly change.


21 posted on 10/09/2014 11:13:38 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Psst, turn the mortality charts right side up.


22 posted on 10/09/2014 11:15:29 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
you will almost certainly lose someone in your life to the flu
BS BS BS. Your entire response is nonsensical jibberish.
23 posted on 10/09/2014 11:17:33 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Those who die from the flu usually have other complications; i.e., they have additional diseases and the flu finishes them off. How many people each year die just from the flu and nothing else?


24 posted on 10/09/2014 11:22:47 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I smell NWO. It has the fragrance of AGENDA - 21 perhaps.
The EBOLA virus has 5 strains.
Zaire had a 90% death rate.
WA (west africa) strain appears half survive. I have tried to keep up and thats what appears. MOST stats arent available.
Those who got Zmapp - half lived half died - no stat on zmapp.

Marburg just showed up in Uganda. Its much the same as ebola.

Other virus loosed in USA in the past few month thanks to illegals are very serious. However, I DO NOT BELIEVE - MORE serious than Ebola - potentially.


25 posted on 10/09/2014 11:27:01 AM PDT by OleShep (ebola, ED68 (OBOLIO), Agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

here’s my problem with ebola that makes it way more dangerous than flu or Entero68 or just about anything else: animals carry.

The authorities in Spain put down the infected nurse’s dog. America loves dogs and cats. Unlike Africa, most American households have at least one pet. If dogs and other animals can be carriers, how would America react psychologically to having to put down all dogs, or all cats or rabbits or guinea pigs in say, Dallas or NYC or Los Angeles? America feeds the world with our pork, beef, chicken and game. America has a more concentrated rangestock production than Africa. So how do we protect our meat sources from infection? What would be the effect - to the world - of wholesale slaughter of ebola-infected herds?

Aren’t the people who believe we should keep allowing flights in from Africa during an active epidemic a little short-sighted?


26 posted on 10/09/2014 11:39:25 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
Not familiar with D68, but Ebola and Enterovirus are here as a the result of open borders

I believe that the D68 is the "enterovirus". This particular strain is not well known in the U.S.; but, can be easily found in Central America; which, just so happens, is where all of the sick "children" came from; and, were sprinkled about the U.S. After which our POTUS told school districts around the country that they were to take this children in without medical forms being filled out by a doctor.

27 posted on 10/09/2014 12:09:16 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: discostu
flu has got ebola beat hands down.

At this point, you are absolutely correct. I think the only caveat here is that this strain of Ebola seems to be more transmissible than previous strains, so the ultimate infection rate may not be known. At this time, I am more concerned about D86 actually, got a few young kids....

28 posted on 10/09/2014 12:18:02 PM PDT by Paradox (and now here we are....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Your comment would be true if the gov’t, that is supposed to protect its Citizens, PROTECTED.

Now, I wouldn’t be flying ANYWHERE near a major hub, not knowing if the person near you, previously, in the terminal, etc. that you touch/brush up on/barefoot through TSA/etc. was infected (knowingly or not)

Hell, I’m surprised there wasn’t (ISN’T) a blow-back from the illegal children infecting our children already!


29 posted on 10/09/2014 12:21:59 PM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Also, swimming pools and motor vehicles are more dangerous than guns.


30 posted on 10/09/2014 12:25:17 PM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
You will not catch ebola, no one you know will ever catch ebola, probably no one you know will ever know someone who caught ebola. This is what makes the flu by far the more dangerous.

Bookmark.

I'll check back in a couple of months...

31 posted on 10/09/2014 12:40:15 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Sorry but the BS and gibberish are coming from you. Things that are likely to happen are always more dangerous than things that aren’t. With your way of thinking asteroids are more dangerous than cars because when an asteroid hits it’s massive destruction. But how many people do you know that have died in both? Which tells us that cars are more dangerous than asteroids. And the flu is more dangerous than ebola.


32 posted on 10/09/2014 1:04:04 PM PDT by discostu (We don't leave the ladies crying cause the story's sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

I don’t think this one is more transmissible, the world just keeps getting smaller. Epidemiologists have been saying for a long time that a big outbreak is inevitable, travel in this world is too easy to keep diseases isolated. The thing that’s always protected us from ebola, and still is, is actually the lethality, it just kills people way too fast to transmit enough to be a real threat. If an ebola strain comes up that makes people just mildly sick for a week or so before things escalate THEN we’re in trouble.


33 posted on 10/09/2014 1:09:39 PM PDT by discostu (We don't leave the ladies crying cause the story's sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Propaganda.


34 posted on 10/09/2014 1:10:35 PM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

The government can’t protect you from everything, it’s a dangerous world. Especially in a country that’s still nominally free, freedom increases risk. Don’t play around in people’s barf or blood and you’ll be fine. Barefoot through TSA isn’t going to get you sick unless you’ve got an open wound on your foot AND somebody barfed their ebola on the carpet.


35 posted on 10/09/2014 1:11:25 PM PDT by discostu (We don't leave the ladies crying cause the story's sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
 photo beast_zps0fcd8365.jpeg
36 posted on 10/09/2014 2:49:05 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

No, its job is not to protect everyone from everything...Its role is quite limited. My contention being even that limited job is forsaken to their god of Liberalism (border SHOULD be shut, flights grounded/denied landing). Anyone truly believe a damn questionnaire and a thermometer as going to stop an epidemic??

Ebola has been found in bodily fluids...that INCLUDES sweat, mucus, etc. I say “Oh, you have to also have a cut..” defeats the whole “They shouldn’t be IN the friggin’ line” to begin! THEN, saving to possibly SIT next to the same (whom may fever [sweat more], sneeze, wipe their nose)....Yeah, I’d be feeling SO much more ‘secure’ w/ the gov’t ‘protections’ in place.


37 posted on 10/10/2014 5:12:22 AM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

But you really can’t keep them out. We’re a nominally free country, sick people get to go places too. They shouldn’t but they do. And unless we know a person has ebola there’s really nothing we can do about it. The whole screening idea is just fanciful, not all sick people (even with ebola) get fevers, and we’re not stopping everybody with a fever from getting on a plane.

Just touching ebola isn’t going to make you sick. It needs to get in you. For the barefoot walking around thing you mentioned that means an open wound. I suppose maybe you could touch the bottom of your foot and then rub your eye. But it’s still a tough process, plus of course somebody needs to have oozed their ebola there in the first place. Which they didn’t.

Really just take responsibility for yourself. Don’t hang around sick people if you can help it, wash your hands. And understand it’s really not that virulent a bug. There are good solid practical reasons why more people die of the flu in this country every year than have died from ebola on the entire planet in all the time we’ve known about it. It’s just not that easy to transmit.


38 posted on 10/10/2014 8:04:11 AM PDT by discostu (We don't leave the ladies crying cause the story's sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Sorry, but SH!T we cannot.

Those infected have NO Right to travel and infect everyone else. The FAA only has to give a denial to land to ANY plane with ANYONE aboard from the hot zone; any airline/plane that refuses to track/supply manifests...no landy either. That’s the ONLY way to handle the issue; one does NOT just go “Oh, we’re a Free nation, come on in and PLEASE don’t infect any of our Citizens”

Again, sorry, but you seem to think this epidemic is harder to catch than winning the lottery. You might also think about all the objects an infected would touch along the way: door/handles, counters, bins, overhead, tray tables, the TINY bathroom, etc. This is not just sweaty bare-feet, that is only ONE possibility.

With a high mortality rate *I* am not willing to take that chance. I’m going to trust gov’t to SAY ‘all is well’? Or that the airlines filter their air/clean the planes?

You’re right though, I don’t plan on flying anywhere anytime soon, but I’m not gullible enough to believe the virus WON’T mutate or that Mr. Walking Death won’t be an issue as long as I have Mr. Sani-Wipe and some soap.


39 posted on 10/10/2014 9:38:02 AM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

But how do you stop the infected and not everybody else? How does the FAA find out if a plane has somebody from a hot zone? And what’s your time frame for the hot zone, in some of those places the situation is under control? Not to mention people we’re SENDING there do have to come back periodically.

You got one right, that is the only way to handle this issue. What you’ve missed is that “way” is functionally impossible and quite simply cannot be done in the real world where international travel is complex and we really have no way of knowing where everybody on a plane has been in the last couple of weeks.

It’s not what I think. It’s simple proven reality. We’ve 40 years worth of tracked history on ebola outbreaks, it doesn’t transmit well. This is a known fact.

Who said anything about trusting the government? I’m talking about being intelligent, understanding basic well published facts, and how this thing actually interacts in your life. The simple reality is that you will never in your life know a single person that has gotten ebola. Probably no one you ever know will ever know someone that has gotten ebola.

If it mutates it would probably mutate into being LESS fatal as well as easier to transmit. From an evolutionary prospective high mortality rate is actually very bad for a virus, it means it often kills its victims before transmitting. It’s so fatal because it’s a species jumper, and transmitting between people is not how it survives. It’s not nearly as fatal in bats. There is no Mr Walking Death, that is your paranoid fantasy that is not supported by 40 years of known outbreaks.


40 posted on 10/10/2014 9:48:29 AM PDT by discostu (We don't leave the ladies crying cause the story's sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson