Posted on 09/19/2014 4:42:43 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2
Yeah, it is as simple as that.
For instance America was founded by a population that was about 99.5% or Protestant, Protestants have only gone democrat 3 times, 1932, 1936, and 1964, and 1964 would not have have happened if the Protestants had won the close, (even stolen) 1960 vote.
If you look at voting, whites vote against the democrats, even white women vote republican.
Without immigration the democrats wouldn’t exist as we know them, that is why JFK devoted so much of his life during the 1950s and early 60s in leading his party to pass the 1965 Immigration Act, and replace the American people with foreign voters.
Exterminate the roaches, hand it all over to bees.
FMCDH(BITS)
Yeah PGR88...I’m beginning to think that being President of the USA is like being President of your High School class. You campaign on big ideals and all the things you will do once elected...and the teachers and the superintendent think “isn’t that cute”. Then you get elected and they advise you that about all you can really do is pick the theme for the Fall Dance and sit at the head table at the Prom.
Ah, I see, so you’re defining “immigrant” as anyone not descended from the original colonists? That includes me, so you can kiss my posterior, buddy.
Hillary in the WH and a GOP Congress with the RINO’s we currently have I’m just about ready for the New Confederacy to secede. :-)
You didn’t like learning about the 1965 Immigration Act.
I see, you are another one of those “conservatives” that supports importing democrat voters and their offspring by the 10s of millions.
In other words, you support the left’s ending America and creating a liberal dream where conservatism doesn’t exist.
All because you personally feel a greater connection to future immigrants than to America.
JFK, like all politicians of his time (and today), postulated many ‘feel good’ ideas, particularly concerning immigration, just to get ELECTED. BUT, like most crap - He just talked. Unfortunately, LBJ walked. The Immigration policy we have today (practically non existent) is nothing like what even Kennedy advocated.
In place of the national origin quota system Kennedy, first in his book, and later as President,2 called for the institution of an immigration policy that judges all applicants on an equal footing. He suggested three basic criteria for admission of immi-grants to the United States 1) the skill of the indivi-dual immigrant, 2) the reunification of families, and 3) priority of registration first come, first served.
What Kennedy clearly did not call for was a massive increase in the number of immigrants being admitted to the United States. He suggested a modest increase in the annual immigration quota that then stood at 156,700.3 There is, of course, a legitimate argument for some limitation upon immigration, wrote Kennedy. We no longer need settlers for virgin lands, and our economy is expanding more slowly than in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
It's probably not right to generalize....though generally speaking you're probably right.
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0104/article_66.shtml
Not probably right, right.
Do people really not know who votes democrat in America?
For instance the democrats have not won the white vote since 1964, how do you think immigrants vote, and why do you think the left is so rabid about getting as many as we can?
A false choice. By choosing 2 you could get 1 anyway.
JFK was obsessed with getting us where we are today and chain immigration and immigrants that would be an anti-American vote.
“However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s. In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960.
In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin. After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.”
When was the last time the Cuban vote went to Democrats?
How big is the repuke majority in both chambers?
sorry, it’s too unrealistic. you may as well ask if we’d rather have a unicorn or a gryphon as president.
You make my point for me, ansel12.
It took his Death to get this and many, many, many screwball idea passed.....Hence the LBJ walked thing. Kennedy was an OBAMA in the 60’s, so wrapped up by the Worlds events, He didn’t have allot of time to do much before he was assassinated. The WORLD EVENTS kept Kennedy and his physco brother and the DEM PARTY from A: Blowing the world to smithereens and B:) Birthing the BEATLES
Are you looking for tiny insignificant exceptions to justify your support for importing 10s of millions of democrat voters and their offspring? Evidently you are.
You are cutting the throat of America and conservatism, evidently, like a democrat, you have a tribal loyalty that puts you on against conservatism.
In 2012, in Florida, the GOP won the Cuban vote 52% to 48%, and Obama won the Cuban vote that went to the polls, while Romney won the absentee ballots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.