Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marijuana industry battling stoner stereotypes
Associated Press ^ | Sep 17, 2014 4:03 AM EDT | Kristen Wyatt

Posted on 09/17/2014 4:45:08 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Tired of Cheech & Chong pot jokes and ominous anti-drug campaigns, the marijuana industry and activists are starting an ad blitz in Colorado aimed at promoting moderation and the safe consumption of pot.

To get their message across, they are skewering some of the old Drug War-era ads that focused on the fears of marijuana, including the famous “This is your brain on drugs” fried-egg ad from the 1980s. […]

“So far, every campaign designed to educate the public about marijuana has relied on fear-mongering and insulting marijuana users,” said Mason Tvert, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project, the nation’s biggest pot-policy advocacy group. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: adcampaign; cannabis; dumbthemdown; libertarians; lowinformationvoters; marijuana; pot; soros; stereotypes; stoners; whytheycallitdope; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: FreedomStar3028

I base most of my thesis on folks I knew in and around school than the bug house. the hospital is the last place druggies or drinkers wind up...but when they do, they are doozies.


61 posted on 09/17/2014 9:39:10 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

stoners should not be allowed to have a DL.


62 posted on 09/17/2014 9:43:18 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net

actually 30 days.

pot also has a very well documented pathology of destroying reaction time and brain function permanently.


63 posted on 09/17/2014 9:45:02 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
pot also has a very well documented pathology of destroying reaction time and brain function permanently.

And of turning you into a bat.

64 posted on 09/17/2014 9:47:32 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Part of the dumbing down of America. A stupid citizenry will more willingly submit to communism and sharia.

I agree and they will vote (or refrain from voting for sane candidates, should they still even exist) away our rights because of their perpetually inebriated thought process.

65 posted on 09/17/2014 9:57:10 AM PDT by infool7 (The ugly truth is just a big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Locally we’ve already had allegations of bribery from one dispensary owner to get the city council to limit the competition.”

Crony Cannabisism. No different than building standards, zoning, street sweeping, courts, etc.

The mere existence of government, at least implies they have something to do.

Those things have included going to war, collecting and spending taxes, etc. More recently they make minute laws about every aspect of human endeavor.

You live in a parish or precinct, or district, or township, or county, or state, the officials must all justify their existence and their budgets.

“Tax and regulate” seem to have been favorite justifications for governments.

So why not regulate substances, too? Alcohol, cocaine, marijuana (hemp) etc.?

That has worked out so well. So let’s have more taxes, more regulations, more tax collectors and regulators.

Then let’s get police to assist, so we get still more government. Then give them all pensions for early retirement, since their work is so critical and dangerous.

Eventually the police could benefit from bigger powerful equipment, too. All the better, to collect the taxes to pay the pensions.

These government workers will form vast unions, to contribute to the campaigns of officials.

Which brings us back to Crony Cannabisism.


66 posted on 09/17/2014 10:19:57 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Stereotypes must contain some element of truth for them to be recognizable.


67 posted on 09/17/2014 12:25:11 PM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Chronic pain maybe. Surgery or injuries, no way. The way the opioids become harmful (in some cases) is continuous use.

Definitely MJ for chronic pain. Opiods are far more dangerous by any measure.

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

68 posted on 09/17/2014 12:55:47 PM PDT by JCG (Anti-medical cannabis = ignorance, hysteria, or worse ... [Haven't tried it but intend to.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Pot is hallucinogenic

If so why does no one hallucinate when stoned? I believe it is listed as a narcotic but doesn’t really fit there either.


69 posted on 09/17/2014 7:17:36 PM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net

Opiates also refer to sleep inducing drugs, so both alcohol and pot could be considered such.

Pot has demonstrated hallucinogenic effects, amd is why it is classed as such, just like LSD. The effects are not as powerful as LSD, but are very real, none the less.

I am sorry you have been mislead all your life, but pot is not the harmless herb you have been told.


70 posted on 09/17/2014 7:25:25 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: wrench

I never said it was harmless, just doesn’t cause hallucinations.


71 posted on 09/18/2014 4:58:09 AM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net

Tour beliefs are not shared by Doctors actually treating patients.

It is not prescribed to elderly cancer patients because of the hallucinations it causes in older folks.

Talk to a cancer oncologist with experience treating the elderly


72 posted on 09/18/2014 5:16:53 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

OMG I do that when I’m sober!

I’m getting older.

Maybe I have the halfheimers


73 posted on 09/18/2014 5:25:23 AM PDT by Califreak (Hope and Che'nge is killing U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

“Halfheimers”

LOL!

;^)


74 posted on 09/18/2014 5:39:48 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
stoners should not be allowed to have a DL.

First off let me preface this by saying I am against legalization.
My question to you is, what is your criteria for limiting a drivers license? Just occasional use? Getting caught driving while intoxicated?

DWI/DUI convictions usually include suspension or revocation of a drivers license. And rightfully so. I feel that a similar punishment should be implemented for pot and other driving while intoxicated situations

However revocation of a license in those states where recreational or medicinal pot is legal and the person has not driven while stoned would be draconian and unconstitutional on the face of it.

75 posted on 09/18/2014 7:37:51 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wrench
Pot has demonstrated hallucinogenic effects, amd is why it is classed as such, just like LSD.

I'll buy that for certain populations or gargantuan doses it can have hallucinogenic effects - but last I heard it was not classified as a hallucinogen but a euphoric. What is your source for your claim?

76 posted on 09/18/2014 8:39:11 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
First off let me preface this by saying I am against legalization. [...] However revocation of a license in those states where recreational or medicinal pot is legal and the person has not driven while stoned would be draconian and unconstitutional on the face of it.

Kudos for not playing the popular game of nail-that-stoner.

77 posted on 09/18/2014 8:40:58 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

PDR for one.

Any medical text used to define drugs (the kind of books used in nursing schools and medical schools, not the kind found in head shops).

For instance:

The term “psychedelic” is used interchangeably with “psychotomimetic” and “hallucinogen”, thus it can refer to a large number of drugs such as classical hallucinogens (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, etc.), empathogen-entactogens (e.g. MDMA), cannabinoids, and some dissociative drugs.

There are hundreds of other sources, but you can believe what you want. I have learned what I know directly from licensed professionals that work daily with such drugs.


78 posted on 09/18/2014 9:15:26 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Modern cannabis is anything but a soft drug. Genetic improvements have made the stuff up their with LSD as a powerful hallucinogen.

Same deal with booze. We have things like White Lightning, which can kill if you drink too much of it. Since that exists, I think we should ban beer and wine too.

79 posted on 09/18/2014 9:19:04 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wrench
The term “psychedelic” is used interchangeably with “psychotomimetic” and “hallucinogen”, thus it can refer to a large number of drugs such as classical hallucinogens (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, etc.), empathogen-entactogens (e.g. MDMA), cannabinoids, and some dissociative drugs.

Interesting! Ties in with this: "Hallucinogens are a diverse group of drugs that cause an alteration in perception, thought, or mood. A rather heterogeneous group, these compounds have different chemical structures, different mechanisms of action, and different adverse effects. Despite their name, most hallucinogens do not consistently cause hallucinations, which are defined as false sensations that have no basis in reality. Often, they are more likely to cause changes in mood or in thought than actual hallucinations." (emphasis added) - http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/293752-overview

80 posted on 09/18/2014 10:09:03 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson