Uh, Ok.
For just one massive example, I suppose it was my ‘political microscope’ that took offense at the stupidity of writing a scene where they come across a group that ended up being robbed and killed by another rogue group of survivors and, though they were unknown to the rogue group, didn’t see fit to even discuss going after the rogue group, the badly-needed supplies they stole, or even some righteous payback. Rather, they just went back to their camp with their, um, ‘tails’ between their legs and make themselves potential prey.
Utterly pathetic writing. And that’s only ‘one’.
Okay, so a TV program’s storyline “offended” you...and pretty personally, from the way you’re going on about it.
So don’t watch.
Good Lord, it’s entertainment, not a survival documentary.
Since you obviously don't like the series, then why are you watching it?
More importantly, why are you trying so desperately to justify your dislike for it on a thread dedicated to folks who DO enjoy it?
You and the other two knuckleheads who are doing the same should get together for a sleepover, that way you can keep each other company and you won't have to bother us.
But what if the rogue group is part of a huge group of bad guys?
How can they know?
There is so much wrong with this show....how Hershel, Andrea, and the Governor’s deaths were handled for starters.