Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/30/2014 7:34:08 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines

These folks are dumber than a box of rocks.


2 posted on 08/30/2014 7:34:54 PM PDT by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Wouldn’t banning anything Chocolate be racis’?


3 posted on 08/30/2014 7:35:27 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; AccountantMom; Aggie Mama; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

4 posted on 08/30/2014 7:36:22 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Again highly paid professors validate the infallibility of the “law of unintended consequences”!


5 posted on 08/30/2014 7:37:46 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (If you are reading this then you are probably one of the NWO designated 6.5 billion excess people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
“This is probably not what parents wanted to see.”

I do not recall parents being asked their opinions

6 posted on 08/30/2014 7:38:30 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

7 posted on 08/30/2014 7:39:29 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Less kids on the free lunch program??

Hmmm - maybe I agree with Mrs Obama


8 posted on 08/30/2014 7:44:13 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Mmmmm . . . 14 oz. of whole milk, chilled to 39 degrees in a tall glass mixed with two slightly heaping teaspoons of Nestle’s Quik. None of that syrupy 2% slop they have in the convenience store coolers, which is hardly better than Yoo-hoo.


9 posted on 08/30/2014 7:44:29 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Why throw out the spoiled milk? It should be sent to MOOchelle at the whitehut.


10 posted on 08/30/2014 7:45:03 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

There is no reason why chocolate milk can’t be every bit as nutritious (if not more so) than 2%. It is simply that in lib think if the kids like it then it must be bad for them.


11 posted on 08/30/2014 7:46:03 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

There is no reason why chocolate milk can’t be every bit as nutritious (if not more so) than 2%. It is simply that in lib think if the kids like it then it must be bad for them.


12 posted on 08/30/2014 7:46:30 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
...and participation in the school lunch program may also decrease,”...

That the researchers see this as a negative is telling.

14 posted on 08/30/2014 7:49:39 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (Settled science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Waiiiiit.....they got rid of the brown milk cause they felt the white was superior????? Call Shartongue and the Just Us department!!


17 posted on 08/30/2014 7:59:28 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

And to think that all of these years we’ve been hearing how Republicans are the ones who want to starve chldren and take away their milk.


18 posted on 08/30/2014 7:59:55 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
no more chocolate milk? Oh, my!
19 posted on 08/30/2014 8:00:22 PM PDT by JPG ("So sue me". OK, we will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I’ll bet liberal socialists never feed their kids a glass of chocolate milk at home. Of course not, they don’t have kids. They abort them. So, your kids better not drink it because some government liberal with an affirmative action arts degree in voodoo nutrition or psychology has decided it is bad for YOU and YOUR family.

Wake up America and smell the coffee, or chocolate milk, whichever you prefer.


22 posted on 08/30/2014 8:03:52 PM PDT by Texicanus (Texas, it's a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

There they go again, picking on liberals some more by judging results instead of intentions. Next thing you know they’ll be telling us gun control doesn’t make us safer.


26 posted on 08/30/2014 8:15:03 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
29 percent of white milk gets thrown out

Wanna bet that's less white milk thrown out than before the choc milk ban? There's such a thing as validity which too many of these studies seem to forget.

27 posted on 08/30/2014 8:36:57 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Suddenly I have a taste for chocolate milk.


32 posted on 08/30/2014 8:59:26 PM PDT by Redcitizen (Hmph. Adventure. Heh. Excitement. Heh. A Jedi craves not these things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Michelle Obama, who knows absolutely nothing about pediatric nutrition, got it all wrong. Most children are very active, and they need carbohydrates because they burn a lot of energy. And older children and teenagers need protein, especially when they engage in sports (or cheerleading, swimming, bike riding, after-school basketball, etc.)
The bean sprouts, tofu and soy burgers that she tried to force our schoolchildren to eat just got thrown away, a tremendous waste. The kids would rather sneak off and buy a candy bar than to eat that vomit-flavored Obamaslop.


34 posted on 08/30/2014 9:02:10 PM PDT by jespasinthru (Proud member of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson