[Sivad]

The offender resides in Vancouver. The company is based in
Connecticut. The company is addressing the terrible behavior
of the CEO. Both professional sports franchises have condemned
the behavior but they still have contracts that need to be enforced.
Perhaps they will change vendors or insist that the CEO be
replaced. But because these to teams operate in California it is
a great opportunity to take a cheap shot at the state. How pathetic.
FR is also based in California. Why not make that connection too?

[verga]

Both professional sports franchises have condemned the behavior but they still have contracts that need to be enforced.

I have a moral turpitude clause in my contract, why not one in this one?