What is "Facebook" anyway? I use Windows 95 
Posted on 08/19/2014 8:27:01 AM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
Being Darren Wilson was sent to the hospital for treatment of facial injuries,and possibly other injuries suffered during the struggle over the weapon,why haven't we seen pics from the hospital by now?It didn't take long before pics of George Zimmerman were released,of which later embarrassed all those who fabricated stories of what actually happened.This case is very similar.And officer finds himself in a violent scuffle with a suspect,but in this case the suspect has a 100 or so pound advantage.And after what Mike Brown did to his face,Officer Wilson was still able to shoot Brown in the fashion he was accused of?
What is "Facebook" anyway? I use Windows 95
Say what you will about Wilson’s innocence or guilt, the STL PD has handled this extremely terrible.
the dead criminal’s family attorney said they need to file charges so it could be investigated....huh?
They can’t sit on the evidence or the officer will be prosecuted. Holder will prosecute the cop in the public limelight long before a trial.
It doesnt matter that he acted in self defense.
Interesting, an Aunt to this young man (killer) makes him out, and the cousin, to be Saints like Saint Micual!!!
They will scream that the cop’s injuries are irrelevant because the perp ran away and disengaged, then tried to surrender. They’ll claim it bolsters their case that Wilson shot him out of anger and rage.
Does she really!?! That’s just shocking! /s
Oh....................... never mind....
FReepers need to have higher standards when posting inaccurate and MISLEADING images. Maybe YOU need to get off the “Bong”!!!
It’s the “trend” like our Florida saint Trayvon!!!
This is a political situation and the timing of release of information needs to be planned out in order to counter the narrative.
Slow release is beneficial and the preferred option in a scenario like this. Put out a little bit, let the other side respond then put out a little bit more that undermines the other sides response.
Eventually you wear the other side down, undermine their credibility with facts. And when their arguments collapse into freefall you win.
Look at the sequence of events with the convienience store tape. Allegations that Brown had robbed the place, followed by outraged denials that he had followed by release of the tape. With the reaction to the release being howls that it should have been held.
Same thing is happening here. Word is put out that the cop got hurt pretty bad, followed by denials. Now we’re getting more specifics, which serve as notice that there will be physical/medical evidence to support.
Because NORMAL procedure isn’t to run to the press and release information in an ongoing investigation.
Asshole
Question: 
They may do that, but the physical evidence won’t support it.
A 6’4” 300lb person doesn’t end up face down after getting hit with five or six rounds unless he’s moving forward.
message to Al Sharpton: NO JUSTICE, NO WATERMELON~!
What it did was provide foundation for the utterly bogus contention that "no right to use deadly force unless your injuries are serious." Basically a comparison of injury, one guy is dead, and all the other one has is stitches and bruises, so the dead guy is automatically "victim" and the injured person is deemed to lack justification for use of deadly force.
The story went that Zimmerman should have just taken his whooping, and then everybody could go home.
Here's a photo of a busted orbital socket in a healing stage.
“This photo is NOT Saint Michual!!!”
Exclamation Points
Rule 1. Use an exclamation point to show emotion, emphasis, or surprise.
Examples:
I’m truly shocked by your behavior!
Yay! We won!
Rule 2. An exclamation point replaces a period at the end of a sentence.
Incorrect: I’m truly shocked by your behavior!.
Rule 3. Do not use an exclamation point in formal business writing.
Rule 4. Overuse of exclamation points is a sign of undisciplined writing. Do not use even one of these marks unless you’re convinced it is justified.
Spell-checker is helpful.
“Michual!!!”
Probably didnt have time to turn on the camera...from what i have read.
I also wonder why he isn’t (with his lawyer) telling HIS side of the story ... Lord knows we’ve heard from everyone else. Of course the lawyer will tell him (and is) to say nothing. But if what he is to say is the TRUTH, then why should it be feared that he tell what he saw?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.