He seems pretty smart. Maybe he can answer these stupid questions.
http://rt.com/news/174496-malaysia-crash-russia-questions/
Should he answer answer every stupid question where “evidence” is a fake photo?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3186704/posts?page=118#118
“He seems pretty smart. Maybe he can answer these stupid questions.”
RT? Really?
What do the Russians have in terms of incriminating evidence? So far, the Russian seem to have many, many questions but no real evidence that Kiev did it.
As far as I’m aware, this is the sum total of Russian “evidence”:
1)Satellite photos supposedly showing that Ukraine also had BUK launchers, which was already publicly known. Said photos also show BUK launchers moving around. Very grainy photos, and time lapse evidence had clouds obscuring most of the base.
2)Anonymous report from a Spanish controller called “Carlos” saying Ukraine seized air traffic control records. Somewhere on Twitter.
3)A diagram drawn by the Russian military supposedly illustrating the Ukrainian jet they detected flying near the airliner.