My mistake.
"but in all the parts I’ve seen cited as being awful there is nothing so dangerous we need to shield adults from it. There are far more offensive books out there than some fictitious man spanking a fictitious women. Before you tell me I need to read the entire series cover to cover,"
I don't want to read it, so why would I insist you do so?
" I’d like to remind you that the burden of proof is on you to prove that the books are a menace to society."
Well, it might be...if I had made any such claim, that is. You want to show me where I did?
"In the end I’m wondering what conservatives hope to accomplish by helping liberals and feminists tighten their control on the media. Broadening the definition of ‘criminal sexual abuse’ to include consensual belt spanking and removing books simply because fictional characters in a fictional world don’t behave like you think a welladjusted person should seems like fascist leftwing goals to me."
Wow, you're throwing false accusations all over the place, aren't you? Did you even read the article? It's written by a Christian who is advising other Christians to think twice before reading it. Why do you have a problem with that, and how does it fall into the category of trying to control the media/practice "fascist leftwing goals?"
who said anything about removing or banning it?