I have been convince by the incessant lies being exposed about global warming and man’s influence on it that all of the scientific community is just one big bunch of horse shit. Universities want to make money and publishing is key. So any crap that can be written down as a THEORY and passed off as “peer reviewed” research is hailed as facts until some other more powerful voice can get their crappier facts published.
The Universities must require courses In Carny Hucksterism so these eminent scientist can learn how to sell their horse shit as real facts. Just so long as the Grants and tenure keep coming.
I used to believe that the term political science was the study of politics. I know have a much better understanding of that phrase
I only went to college for frat parties and beer rallies!
Oh Man, what did I miss out on?
Here is a clue, you rocket scientist’s.....like an RC cola, cold water will hold CO2 and when it warms the fizzy goes away.
The cure for bad science is good science. The Piltdown Man was an utter and complete fraud, a hoax. The hoax lasted because it “confirmed” the expectations of most scientists. It was finally and completely exposed as a fraud by scientists.
The global warming idea is not all fraudulent but the enforced conclusions and ridicule of non conforming studies is very unscientific, as you say it’s political.
It’s has been a valid observation that much of the Arctic had gotten warmer. Why, for how long, what does it mean and how long will it last, are all questions up in the air. Cooling back down seems to be happening. The climate is always changing, usually regional change, eventually global. Now that the Arctic is cooling off again and the Antarctic glacier melt is due to volcanic intrusion, at least in part, more work needs to be done. CO2 is a smaller part of the puzzle than previously thought.
Of course, the idea that Arctic warming might lead to more plant life and, thus, more CO2 adsorption seems to be obvious, at least as a possibility.