Skip to comments.
Julia Louis-Dreyfus blames nude photo on "drunken stupor"
CBS ^
| April 9, 2014
| Lauren Moraski
Posted on 04/10/2014 3:54:42 PM PDT by Gamecock
Blame it on a drunken stupor. That's what Toronto Mayor Rob Ford did.
If you pick up the new issue of Rolling Stone, you'll get to see in Julia Louis-Dreyfus in the buff. The 53-year-old "Veep" actress unveiled the magazine's cover photo on Twitter:
She tweeted that she's about to get more Twitter followers -- and she's right. We just started following her.
Her butt-naked appearance coincides with the third season of "Veep," which premiered on Sunday. In the issue, which hits newsstands on Friday, Louis-Dreyfus dishes on the upcoming season (she's thrilled her character gets to curse a lot), her beloved role on "Seinfeld" (which she landed partly because of her "disposition") and the entertainment industry.
"There is sexism -- I'm not denying its existence," she said. "But I'm saying that I will deny its effort against me. I just pay it no nevermind and say, 'Get out of my way.'"
"Veep" airs Sundays at 10:30 p.m. ET on HBO.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: boycotttimewarner; fakebutaccurate; hollyweird; lookatme; rollingstoned; sexting; trampstamp; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
1
posted on
04/10/2014 3:54:42 PM PDT
by
Gamecock
To: MotleyGirl70; Cagey; Mr. Brightside; earlJam; Rb ver. 2.0; lesser_satan; Taffini; jdm; countess; ...
So our little Lainey is a drunken, foul mouth, liberal trollop.
Not that different than her role on Seinfeld I guess.
2
posted on
04/10/2014 3:55:53 PM PDT
by
Gamecock
(If the cross is not foolishness to the lost world then we have misrepresented the cross." S.L.)
To: GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; Bender2; NFHale; Perdogg
Ping.
Better looking than Biden!
Looks like she’s the only one to break the Seinfeld curse. George and Kramer, not so much.
3
posted on
04/10/2014 3:59:38 PM PDT
by
Impy
(RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
To: Gamecock
Estimated net worth: $3B.
Really.
To: Gamecock
Julia who? You say she was in something called Seinfeld? Never heard of them.
5
posted on
04/10/2014 3:59:55 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Gamecock
It's a publicity stunt.
Looks like it worked.
6
posted on
04/10/2014 4:00:08 PM PDT
by
x
To: Gamecock
Appropriate of the liberal historical knowledge of the Constitution, which John Hancock did not sign.
7
posted on
04/10/2014 4:00:56 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
To: Impy; AuH2ORepublican; Bender2; NFHale; Perdogg
8
posted on
04/10/2014 4:01:50 PM PDT
by
GOPsterinMA
(You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
To: Gamecock
I think she is one of the most genuinely funny women comics
around. And she still looks damn good for 53.
9
posted on
04/10/2014 4:03:13 PM PDT
by
webheart
(Watch out for the bots! They will disagree with you!)
To: ClearCase_guy
That's her father's money, not what she made in show business.
Probably tied up in trusts, if it's actually in her name.
10
posted on
04/10/2014 4:04:16 PM PDT
by
x
To: Gamecock
Pictures or it isn’t true. Nice Butt Dimples anyhow.
11
posted on
04/10/2014 4:04:57 PM PDT
by
Usagi_yo
(Islamunism = Facism + Islam : Islamunist = someone that adheres to Islamunism.)
To: x
True enough. But still an interesting bit of information.
To: FredZarguna
I knew something was wrong right away, thought John Hancock signed it last or near last.
13
posted on
04/10/2014 4:06:06 PM PDT
by
Usagi_yo
(Islamunism = Facism + Islam : Islamunist = someone that adheres to Islamunism.)
To: Gamecock
What are those nasty indentations on her lower back?
14
posted on
04/10/2014 4:06:39 PM PDT
by
icwhatudo
(Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
To: Gamecock
Thank goodness they spared us the raw unphotoshopped version of her body.
15
posted on
04/10/2014 4:06:50 PM PDT
by
flying Elvis
("In...War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst" Clausewitz.)
To: Gamecock
Is that a real tat or just one that washes away?
16
posted on
04/10/2014 4:08:17 PM PDT
by
US_MilitaryRules
(Tastes like Heaven, Burns like Hell! Mmmmmm. What is it?)
To: Gamecock
I guess every person has their own view of beauty. I sometime watch reruns of Seinfeld. For a while I really never paid attention to her looks, she seemed sort of attractive but after actually paying attention, she is not attractive at all.
She looks a little bit like a carnival worker. The more you look at her the worse she looks. At least that is my take.
17
posted on
04/10/2014 4:09:05 PM PDT
by
yarddog
(Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
To: Gamecock
Another waste of cyber ink.
18
posted on
04/10/2014 4:09:33 PM PDT
by
Sivad
(NorCal red turf)
To: GOPsterinMA
Would you write your name on her back? Apparently John Hancock did cause he didn’t the sign the Constitution. ;d
19
posted on
04/10/2014 4:09:37 PM PDT
by
Impy
(RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
To: webheart
And she still looks damn good for 53.I suppose she does. Just keep in mind every image you see of her has been touched, retouched and touched again.
20
posted on
04/10/2014 4:10:04 PM PDT
by
Tea Party Terrorist
(Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson