Posted on 02/21/2014 2:39:18 PM PST by butterdezillion
Remember that video of the plane crash in Hawaii after which Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy "died"?
You need to take a closer look.
Because to do so would involve going down the rabbit hole of your wacky conspiracy and no sane person could be bothered to do that. The problem is that every day your theory changes - nobody can keep up.
You started off by asserting that Fuddy was murdered in the water, and her open casket funeral attended my hundreds of mourners and filmed by two news stations was a fake funeral with no body in the casket, instead an urn containing her ashes. Despite catholics rarely being cremated.
You also claimed that Microsoft hacked your computer and was communicating directly with you on this issue. It turned out to be standard Microsoft error messages!
Then you tried to prove there was mystery extra passenger, that was presumably the assasin waiting to strike. And then it was proven that there was no extra passenger - it would have been darned hard to hide one in a plane that size - but I’m sure butter has ever been ona plane, so she may not realise that. It’s the only explanantion for her obtuseness on this issue.
When it was proven conclusively that it was Fuddy in the casket, you changed your theory to be a faked body. You claimed Fuddy at 5 ft 2 inches was too large to fit into a conventional coffin. When it was shown that all your calculations were incorrect because you were using Word to do image analysis (!). So then you fell back on something fishy about the folds of fabric on Fuddy’s casket hiding something - until you were shown images that disproved that too.
When there was no evidence for that theory, you change again. Now Fuddy was spirited away for her own safety and is still alive - so whose body did her CLOSE FAMILY say goodbye to in the open casket?
And then there was a mystery diver - such a mystery that he had no actual diving equipment about his person. And when it was proven that the image was a knee, and not a mystery diver, you changed again. Frankly I dont even know what your latest Fuddy unified theory is - perhaps you could lay it out for us. Is she dead, alive , hidden, buried ? And most of all, why?
You claim that whatever happened to Fuddy was becasue she was due to testify and blow the whole story wide open. But she wasn’t a defendant in any live case, and even if she had been, she would never have been compolled to testify outside of Hawaii. It’s just nonsense.
And now the latest - photos of the plane are faked because you can’t see a window. Except you are the only person insisting on not seeing the window - everyone else can.
So please give it up - everything you’ve said about this accident has turned out to be wrong, but you won’t stop until every shadow in every photograph is explained. That way madness lies. Stop before you get zotted for bringing your Infowars stuff here.
For the yellowish protrustion to be Fuddy’s shoe, where we see the entire oval created by the sole of her shoe, what angle would that shoe have to be to the camera? Would it work to have the shoe perpendicular to the camera, or would the shoe have to be parallel to the camera?
Take a shoe with a white sole and hold it in front of you so that the person wearing the shoe would be in the position you believe Fuddy to be in those images and the shoe is right in front of you. How much of the sole do you see? What shape is it?
Now put the sole so you can see the entire oval shape made by it? When you are able to see that shape, where would the person wearing the shoe have to be?
The full images can be seen at my blog so you can see context or see the images smaller. These are the same resolution of photos as the photos in which you saw the other details you saw.
Have you ever heard of a rebreather?
Means. Multiple. arrhythmia induced through drug, stress or exertion, or other event appearing to be a heart problem, in tropical heat (at the destination), remote from facilities which are capable of giving critical cardiac care.
Opportunity: Improved by having high stress event en route.
It would have to be someone who would be close to the target normally on a regular basis or not appear abnormal to be there, and someone professional enough to use the opportunity.
An alternate possibility is that someone was hedging their bet and saw the entire compliment on board as expendable, fully expecting a significantly worse landing.
None of the things you claim as having been “proven” have been proven. What you perceive as me “changing my disproven theory” is just me moving on to additional evidence. And the evidence is all that matters so if there is evidence that really does refute my theory I would of course change my theory.
How many times have you looked at that video at 1/8th speed? How many screenshots have you taken? How many of the screenshots that I have taken have you identified what you DID see, rather than saying all the reasons you should not be seeing anything?
Butterdezillion is talking about her death being faked in which case your SEAL would also have to have taken her to hospital on his own, tried to resuscitate her, perform and sign the autopsy, organise the funeral, arrange for the open casket to contain a dummy Fuddy as we all as filming and ‘photoshopping’ the film for later showing on two TV channels.
How many SEALs do you know who could do that?
So - looking for nouns in your post - you see a bush and a bear?
Do you have any idea what these things I’ve pointed to in this post could be?
My great-uncle was a C-47 pilot throughout WWII. His C-47 was shot down on D-Day. They crashed into the English Channel. He said that everyone’s injuries were from when the plane hit the water (it was like hitting cement). But the channel was so full of boats that a ship came by and picked them all up. All survived. That said, his plane crashed after being shot down but A Planned Glide With The Right Plane is very possible.
“You don’t kill someone with a secret who has disclosed that secret. You kill someone who possesses that secret undisclosed so that it surely will not be disclosed.”
Exactly. So the message must be, to everyone else that has a secret: “Go tell your secret right NOW, so we won’t kill you.”
“How do you know she was keeping secrets?”
I don’t, it’s the conspiracy nuts that make that assumption. I’m just following their reasoning to the logical conclusion that they neglect to acknowledge.
“How do you know she wasn’t about to spill the beans or at least divulged something worrisome to the you-know-who’s?”
I don’t know, but there is no evidence one way or the other, so it’s pretty pointless to speculate about. It wouldn’t change the message being sent to any other potential secret-keepers anyway.
Yeah, I’m no diver but even I know you would see more than just shiny black and a bit of yellow, there would be nozzles and hoses and whatnot. Even the yellow thing is way too small to be a scuba tank.
I don’t know. If you take enough pictures of smoke and clouds you can find great pictures of Jesus, Satan etc. Remember the “faces in the smoke” pictures after 9-11?
I’m not ruling out that Fuddy was killed. But ditching a plane over a diver would not be a workable plan. In Hollywood, yes, in reality, no.
If she was killed, her killer was on the plane. That is the ONLY way to ensure the outcome.
“I’m supposed to believe that they [the infamous they] rigged a plane crash for nobody to die, but crash in the ocean near ninja assassin divers?”
Dude, I posted that “theory” as a parody of the conspiracy nuts, weeks ago when this story came out, as a “do you really think this is what happened?” kind of thing. Lo and behold, parody catches up to reality with these guys.
I am NOT signing on to ANY of her theories. In fact, I dismiss a frogman under the ditched plane entirely.
But to be fair, I wanted to point out that frogmen don’t wear open-circuit (bubble making) bottles on their backs.
This is as far as I go: If Fuddy was murdered, her killer was on the plane.
“When everybody can do the same thing that I did, it makes it a lot less advantageous for anybody to do anything to get rid of me.”
Ha! I hardly think anyone is plotting to send the teleporting, midget frogman assassins after you just yet.
See 456 and 458 for pictures of what frogmen use, NOT open-circuit SCUBA bottles on their backs.
“The body in her casket may or may not be the same body.”
She had a freaking open casket funeral. What do you think, they called in Madame Tussaud?
Why on earth would anyone waste their time indulging this nonsense when you have yet to show a single piece of evidence for your latest theory, whatever the he$$ it is.
Who gives a fig about the yellow shoe bottom - or are you going to continue until every shadow in every photograph is explained to your total satisfaction? GIVE IT UP - YOU LOST.
If you need answers to everything - why not talk to the guy who took the pictures? He is discussing you on fb and isn’t very impressed by your analysis. In fact he thinks you are crazy, and at the moment you aren’t doing much to defend that accusation. Please stop before it gets really ugly. How many peopke on this thread agree with you - is it 3 or 4? Even very hard core birthers are telling you you are wrong - please listen to them.
Of course - where is your evidence for one? You claimed to see a yellow air tank - not a rebreather. Are you changing your theory AGAIN? So you hear of a rebreather for the first time in your life, and now the mystery diver has one and not a yellow air tank? Too funny!
And please, where is the divers regulator? Nobody, but nobody, can scuba dive without one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.