Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgiaDawg32

I heard on Fox & Friends this morning that Phil had been warned about making such comments when their show went on the air. If he agreed to such an arrangement, then he shouldn’t have spoken out so forcefully in the interview. All he had to do was say as a Christian he believes homosexuality to be a sin.

I’m not feeling quite as outraged about A&E’s actions if this is the case.


4 posted on 12/21/2013 7:03:49 AM PST by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Twotone

Don’t depend on the MSM to tell you the truth. They’re all spinning very hard. Duck Dynasty is popular and people can be influenced by what the Robertsons say. The libs don’t like that.


11 posted on 12/21/2013 7:08:03 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
Really? GQ interviewed Phil, not the cast of the show. That's a slippery slope you're basing that opinion on because if that contract would extend beyond the show and to an interview, then that contract should say that by signing this contract, I agree to forfeit my Constitutional right to freedom of speech.
16 posted on 12/21/2013 7:10:36 AM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
I’m not feeling quite as outraged about A&E’s actions if this is the case.

Where does the left find you guys?

23 posted on 12/21/2013 7:12:34 AM PST by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
I heard on Fox & Friends this morning that Phil had been warned about making such comments when their show went on the air. If he agreed to such an arrangement, then he shouldn’t have spoken out so forcefully in the interview. All he had to do was say as a Christian he believes homosexuality to be a sin. I’m not feeling quite as outraged about A&E’s actions if this is the case.

He gave an honest answer to an honest question. Supposing that he had signed away his freedom of speech, without actually knowing, and using it as an excuse as to why being railroaded for enjoying the Constitutional protections of free speech might get you an interview if A&E ever needs to hire new help.

33 posted on 12/21/2013 7:17:06 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
I’m not feeling quite as outraged...

But if there was a morals clause, Phil must say moral things like he did!

35 posted on 12/21/2013 7:17:31 AM PST by DaveyB ("When injustice becomes the law; rebellion becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

The parts of the interview that are most offensive to homosexuals are almost word for word quotes from the bible. The rest is mostly just personal observation and common sense. Mr. Robertson is just the messenger. The real battle is with what is written in the bible.


57 posted on 12/21/2013 7:27:43 AM PST by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Don’t talk like that anymore on the FreeRepublic. How do you like it?


60 posted on 12/21/2013 7:29:09 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
I heard on Fox & Friends this morning that Phil had been warned about making such comments when their show went on the air. If he agreed to such an arrangement, then he shouldn’t have spoken out so forcefully in the interview.

That's a big "If" and so is the fact that an interview with GQ set up and accompanied by someone from the show is not the same thing as saying it on the air.

63 posted on 12/21/2013 7:31:25 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

“All he had to do was say as a Christian he believes homosexuality to be a sin.”

He did, with nothing more than explaining why he believes it in the simplest clearest terms. Perfectly reasonable. They asked, he answered.


89 posted on 12/21/2013 7:55:55 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
This is not about Phil it is about the 'Bible' and trying to make it hate speech....period. The very foundation our freedoms were founded on they are trying to make hate speech.

Sorry, I stand with Phil over what liberals are doing to our society and forcing on Christians.

It is time to choose, to make a stand. Do we as a people allow these evil people suppress the 'Bible', God and his followers or stand up and say we have had enough of God being silenced.

99 posted on 12/21/2013 8:08:48 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Put a sock in it! You sound like a hand-ringing liberal. Phil did not do a damn thing wrong. The fault is 100% with A&E.


122 posted on 12/21/2013 8:29:57 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

“I heard on Fox & Friends this morning that Phil had been warned about making such comments when their show went on the air”

It would be necessary to actually see the written agreement with A&E to know whether he agreed not to discus his religious views during the filming of the show or whether he agreed not to discuss them in any other context.


135 posted on 12/21/2013 8:47:08 AM PST by kitkat (STORM THE HEAVENS WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

That would be a ridiculous agreement, and given the family’s strong Christian beliefs, I have a hard time crediting the idea. The Robertson family are still individual private citizens and as such have a right to express their personal opinions/views. Phil was not representing A&E when he did the interview — nor was he representing the show created at A&E. This is no longer the “golden age” of Hollywood where studios can dictate what an actor/actress can and cannot say and put limitations on what they can do privately in order to keep their livelihood. Those kinds of “contracts” haven’t been around since the 40’s - or 50’s at best.


137 posted on 12/21/2013 8:52:46 AM PST by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

You can not warn somebody not to refrain from religious speech. And being an employer does not exempt you from that law. Read Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.


158 posted on 12/21/2013 10:03:47 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
I heard on Fox & Friends this morning that Phil had been warned about making such comments when their show went on the air. If he agreed to such an arrangement, then he shouldn’t have spoken out so forcefully in the interview.
I've read that early on when the show started, the producers had asked them to tone down praying and had inserted unnecessary < bleeps > to make it seem as if they uttered profanities.

The family confronted them at the time and told them to knock off the fake < bleeps > and that they were a Christian family who would continue to express their faith as they saw fit. If A&E didn't like it, they should cancel the show.

The producers backed down. I expect A&E will likely back down again, primarily because they are blinded by the dollar signs (certainly, not out of any moral sense of right or wrong) -or- wthere is the possibility we might see the Robertsons on a different channel, continuing to express their faith and even more emboldened to righteously denounce sinful acts.

168 posted on 12/21/2013 10:31:14 AM PST by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

he did not speak out forcefully in the interview, he just answered a question


186 posted on 12/21/2013 5:03:32 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
Yes, but God sees sin and sin.
Adultery, theft, bestiality, murder, homosexuality, lying and so forth are all sins.
God did not say to not call a sin a sin anywhere I read, only to not cast stones.
So from there Christians say chastise the sin, but love the sinner and I don't think Phil had done anything wrong based on the Bible.
Now if A&E somehow thought Phil was capable of a sophisticated interview where he remembered to not use certain PC words as if he was the President, then A&E are stupid IMO.

Anyway, for A&E this will be a lose / lose.

215 posted on 12/21/2013 11:58:14 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

He didn’t make the comment on Duck Dynasty.


223 posted on 12/22/2013 8:55:45 PM PST by Randy Larsen (Aim small, Miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson