Posted on 10/24/2013 1:12:03 PM PDT by Red Badger
Material Scientist As distinquished from Material girl, who collects material, but learns nothing.
They move through the graphene as a wave. It’s a wave! The moment to applaud would be now.
It may open up space travel in ways we haven’t dreamed of.
I could see these caps revolutionizing cyclotron research...smaller but much more powerful storage caps needed to store energy for the power bursts necessary to smash atoms...the size of the equipment needed being reduced by orders of magnitude.(reminds me of the condensor used to build the “Interocitor” in “This Island Earth”).
It is serendipitous irony that Carbon, whose Atomic number is 6, which is the basic building block of all life, may also provide the breakthru’s needed for unlimited clean energy production and/or highly efficient storage of electrical power.
I agree! The possibilities a mind-boggling! As an aside,This Island Earth is one of my favorite movies. Saw it at The Willow Theater in 1955, when I was 9!
This movie needs a serious remake, though I don’t criticize anything about the original. Another I like is “Forbidden Planet” which was groundbreaking as it influenced a host of directors and sci fi writers. One can see its influence on the Star Trek series, for example.
“Earth vs The Flying Saucers” is another good one!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_vs._the_Flying_Saucers
Just for perspective, the best lithium polymer batteries deliver about 250 Wh/Kg.
The power density for supercaps is pretty good though, as is their longevity.
Will Dr Pint name the consortium to exploit this nanotech “Pint-sized materials”?
Thanks Red Badger.
That graph shows grapheme caps topping out at about 4.5 Wh/Kg energy density.
Just for perspective, the best lithium polymer batteries deliver about 250 Wh/Kg.
The power density for supercaps is pretty good though, as is their longevity.
..............
I’m not getting this. If grapheme caps top out at about 4.5 Wh/Kg energy density....why are they so much more interesting/better/important/powerful than lithium polymer batteries which deliver about 250 Wh/Kg? Isn’t 250 Wh/Kg many orders of magnitude better/important/powerful than 4.5 Wh/Kg?
It’s not the energy storage that’s attractive, it’s the power density. Lithium batteries take hours to recharge. Supercaps can be recharged in seconds (or deliver their whole charge in seconds).
Batteries generally have fairly short lives; this is certainly true with lithium batteries, whose high performance characteristics are offset by the fact that they're really only just barely stable from a chemistry standpoint. There have been a number of spectacular fires resulting from damaged or overcharged lithium batteries; as they age they become less stable; most lithium battery packs include little special-purpose "smart power" chips to keep them from exploding. These chips monitor their temperature, charge state, and other parameters to keep them stable.
For that reason, I imagine that supercaps might find uses in satellites and other applications where maintenance is impossible.
Another application for supercaps would be in hybrid cars, where you have a regular engine supplying power, and an electrical power source supplying additional power for acceleration, and storing power from regenerative braking.
Graphene - like transistors were in the 50’s....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.