If we have another five years of this madness.
Posted on 03/13/2013 5:51:39 PM PDT by Morgana
ROME, March 12, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Boris Dittrich, the homosexual activist called the “father” of the political movement in favor of Dutch gay “marriage”, has admitted that group marriages of three or more people, is the next, inevitable logical step in the dismantling of the western world’s traditional marriage laws.
In a video interview with Yagg, the French online homosexual magazine, Dittrich, a former Dutch MP and homosexualist activist working for Human Rights Watch, related the carefully laid-out plan that established first public acceptance legal civil partnerships, which in turn led inevitably to changing the definition of marriage.
The redefinition of marriage, he said, has led to discussions of allowing group marriages of three or more persons. “But that’s the beginning of something completely new,” he added. He predicted that this next step “will take a lot of years.”
Dittrich admitted that “it took a long time” to push the notion of “marriage equality” through the political process. Until he and other homosexualist activists started the process in the Netherlands, “there was nowhere in the world marriage equality existed”. He started the discussion as early as 1994 but it took another “seven years of debate” before a bill could be presented.
He pointed out that opponents of the change in the Netherlands brought the same arguments and objections that are currently being made in France, which is facing a similar legal change.
In the countries where it has been created, most of the legislators pushing for gay “marriage” started the process by promising that “civil partnerships” were as far as it would go. In the UK, when homosexualists pushed for civil unions, the public was assured that the category of civil partnerships was being created solely in order to ensure fair taxation and property inheritance laws for people in same-sex relationships.
This line of argument was widely accepted even by religious leaders who denied, almost as vigorously as the lobbyists themselves, that there was any danger of the definition of marriage being abolished. British MPs supporting the plan insisted that civil partnerships were the end of the line and that marriage would remain untouched.
Dittrich, however, told Yagg that bringing in civil partnerships was always intended as the first step in the larger plan. When he entered Parliament as an MP, Dittrich said he “immediately” started to talk about same-sex “marriage” but quickly realised that the public was not ready to accept it. A slower route had to be taken.
“We thought it might be psychologically better to first introduce registered partnerships,” he said. Once this was established in 1998, he said that “people got used to the idea that two men or two women went to the municipality, had their relationship recognised by the law. And people called it a ‘gay marriage’.
“So for the general public there was no distinction. And people got used to it and they realised there was no revolution that broke out and the country didn’t fall into a moral abyss.
“So then the next step of marriage equality, and really being equal, was a logical step.”
The most effective wedge to bring the idea before the public was to “focus on the principles of equality and non-discrimination,” and emphasise the “distinction between Church and state.”
“So if people are against marriage between two people of the same sex, well, OK, that’s fine they don’t have to deal with it. I told all these religious people, ‘we don’t touch religious marriage,’ but we are talking about civil marriage.”
“And according to the law, everybody should be treated equally.”
I’m not onboard until marriage to lawn clippings is the norm. (I’ve always been a bit “different”)
One husband is enough! ;)
This will lead to tribal fragmentation and civil war among klans.
How’s Vernon Wayne Howell’s inbred group-love-fest doing these days?
Hell awaits this scumbag
Change the definition of marriage once and Pandoras open box is full of endless surprises.
i want tax deductions and welfare for my hundreds of lego minifigures. college is expensive.
who are you to deny me this? i want my equality NOW!
/s, but that’s where this is going...
If we have another five years of this madness.
Geez, in a “Group Marriage” you wouldn’t have to die to go to Hell! I cannot imagine problems with such interpersonal dynamics this would cause.
I am reminded of the Mark Twain quote when he was being evangelized by Mormons and the Mormon ask Twain to give him one verse in the Bible that forbade polygamy. Twain’s response was to quote Matthew 6:26 “No man can serve more than one master.”
This would be that problems in spades
My biggest fear is being cast into hell forever. What can be worse than that? Jesus (Yashua) is my Savior and so I hope to enter Heaven instead. Why some people choose hell is beyond me and I shudder for their awful, godless destination.
Could it be that someday we can marry a horse?
Is Pedophile marriage next?
Can we water the tree yet?
‘Boris Dittrich, the homosexual activist called the “father” of the political movement in favor of Dutch gay “marriage”, has admitted that group marriages of three or more people, is the next, inevitable logical step in the dismantling of the western world’s traditional marriage laws.’
It’s actually refreshing to hear one of them being more honest and open about their end game and the logical results of the devaluation of natural marriage. I get so sick of the lies we hear from them about how the next step will “never happen” as they con the easily influenced folks in our culture into accepting the next sexual sin as “normal”.
I was thinking the same thing as you. See how they suckered people with their strategy of step-by-step lies. Another example of the frog in the pot, turn up the heat slowly, slowly and the frog will get cooked before it knows what is going on. These people are really evil.
I am glad that they are finally admitted how deceptive and manipulating they were. Now that they revealed their strategy it will make it more difficult to use it again. I am going to save this article as I am sure it will come in handy in the future.
The moon is a harsh mistress.
And bestiality.
Didn’t the Mormons start out with “group” marriage?
How did that work for them?
Islamic marriage
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.