It is indeed a rebuttal.
Beware accepting stodgy, biased professionals who find a theory they like and then deny any new evidence. They (almost all) keep official definitions and explanations.
New evidence of earth fluctuation has been presented and well documented HOWEVER the majority of said professionals CLING to their old theories.
If you accept the popular theories you are most likely well outside of enlightened and new discoveries just like the majority of humanity.
I understand and accept that you cling to (outdated science) that most people BELIEVE only what they learned early in life and fail to incorporate new evidence which is contradictory.
It make you feel safe but you are still closed minded.
You apparently don’t understand how science works. And what the heck is “earth fluctuation”? I’d be interested to read some of the “well documented” evidence that discusses this phenomena.