Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Answer to a Question My Daughter-in-Law Asked: What Can Done to Reduce Gun Violence

Posted on 01/18/2013 4:36:29 AM PST by ducttape45

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: ducttape45
"Communism killed over 500,000,000 million people in the 20th century alone"

Uh, you might want to check your math.....(try more like, ONE HUNDRED million).

21 posted on 01/18/2013 5:34:39 AM PST by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
My answer would be in two parts:

1) Why do you consider gun violence special? Are you any less dead if you are stabbed to death, or beaten to death?

2) The problem of violence come from allowing violent people loose on the street. According to a 2006 Dept of Justice paper:

* Thirty-six percent of violent felons had an active 
criminal justice status at the time of their arrest. 
This included 18% on probation, 12% on release 
pending disposition of a prior case, and 7% on 
parole.

* Seventy percent of violent felons had a prior arrest 
record, and 57% had at least one prior arrest for a 
felony. Sixty-seven percent of murderers and 73% of 
those convicted of robbery or assault had an arrest 
record.

* A majority (56%) of violent felons had a prior 
conviction record. Thirty-eight percent had a prior 
felony conviction and 15% had a previous conviction 
for a violent felony. 

Too many violent criminals are on the street due to plea bargains. We need to focus on keeping violent criminals in jail.
22 posted on 01/18/2013 5:35:50 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

It’s a category for original content, editorial or thoughtful, analytic type posts such as yours. On your main FR page, look at the topics up top and you’ll see FreeperED - click on it to see the kinds of posts there. I think this is more appropriate for what you wrote than General/Chat for instance.

Your post is “gone like the wind” already to relatives/friends in FL, TX, VA .... thanks so much for taking the time to put ‘fingers to keyboard’!


23 posted on 01/18/2013 5:37:37 AM PST by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

Reduce violent crime by reducing the victim mentality and increasing the number of father’s present in children’s lives.

Focusing on gun crime is pointless, as it is violent crime that matters. I a woman that is beaten, raped, and strangled with her stockings better off because she wasn’t shot? Tell her that violent crime in “gun free” countries makes the U.S. look like an Amish picnic.


24 posted on 01/18/2013 5:41:46 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

Whether we’ve fallen away from God or not, gun violence, indeed crime in general, has generally been declining for 20 years. All the predictions that violent video games, violent movies, violent music, etc, was going to cause a surge in violence turned out to be bunk.

You’re answer is way too wordy. The long term answer is clean up the ghettos by reducing dependency - but that is a big fight about the social welfare state. The short term answer is to be very tough on crime. That means more effective policing the streets and locking people up for a very long time. The NY Times may struggle with this, but sensible American’s don’t - the crime rate goes down as we lock more criminals up.


25 posted on 01/18/2013 5:49:09 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
Gun violence is an awful thing. Its' cause is ALWAYS a bad or irresponsible person.

Outlaw irresponsible and bad people.

In fact, there is no other solution.

26 posted on 01/18/2013 5:49:45 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

The churches recognize that legitimate insanity exists, and for the most part, they agree that it is usually not demonic in character, but a malfunction of the brain or body.

This being said, the old definition of insanity was that a person, because of their mental illness, represents a threat of harm to themselves or others. As such, that they be institutionalized is a good thing for society at large, and a charitable thing for the mentally ill person.

However, because in past states confined people who were more inconvenient than representing a threat to themselves or others, eventually the courts decided that few but the entirely incapable should be confined in mental institutions. As such, the bulk of the criminally insane are confined in prisons, not mental institutions.

For this reason, there is a legitimate national reason to have several large federal reservation-medical facilities set aside specifically for the treatment of the mentally ill who are dangerous.

It would not be easy to be confined to such a reservation-medical facility, instead it would have to be after a chain of independent psychiatric evaluations.

First would be a private psychiatrist, family, or police referral which goes to the existing county psychiatric facility in use today. If, in their opinion, the person is a threat, then they are sent to the state institution for evaluation.

If, after an independent examination, the state mental institution determines that the findings are accurate, then a referral is made to the federal reservation. They perform a final initial independent diagnosis, and then different psychiatrists perform full follow up diagnoses each year thereafter.

Once admitted, unlike many state mental hospitals, which are used to “warehouse” the mentally ill; the federal reservation-medical center will active work to find a suitable treatment for them. If they find a drug, or a new drug is released to market, that seems to be effective, then for the first years’ use of that drug they act as a trustee.

This means that for some months the drug is administered under supervision, and then they are issued the drug for additional months, to determine if they are capable of continuing their medication on their own.

Release from the facility works in the reverse of admission, in that they must be certified at the federal, state and county level first. And any of these can veto their release.


27 posted on 01/18/2013 5:55:48 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

Gun violence is not the problem...Liberal politicians are.

In 2011:

323 death attributed to Guns.

496 deaths attributed to Hammers.

650 deaths attributed to Knives.

12,000 deaths attributed to Drunk Drivers.

195,000 deaths attributed to Malpractice by Physicians.

???? Deaths caused by wars instigated by politicians ???


28 posted on 01/18/2013 5:59:58 AM PST by chainsaw ("Two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
You are right, all violence is caused by sin. Jesus has defeated sin and death but violence will only increase until the Prince of Peace has returned to trample his vintage. Why is gun violence more heinous than abortion violence?

Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

29 posted on 01/18/2013 6:06:47 AM PST by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

Good work. They take the Creator out of the equation, then they say that two plus two is three and you are ignorant if you cannot see that.


30 posted on 01/18/2013 6:07:24 AM PST by winodog (Thank you Jesus for the calm in my life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
for years and years, the Left has told us that it is degrading and morale-lowering to institutionalize those that are only marginally on the safe side of the sane-insane line of demarcation. [Yes, I understand that line to be somewhat fuzzy.] But I note that the perpetrators of all the big massacres of note in recent history (Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Oslo, Sandy Hook Elementary) had a history of mental instability. Decisions have consequences.
31 posted on 01/18/2013 6:12:17 AM PST by Pecos (If more sane people carried guns, fewer crazies would get off a second shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Too many violent criminals are on the street due to plea bargains. We need to focus on keeping violent criminals in jail.

Liberals crack me up: when I hear one say, "penalties for gun violence must be harsher", I respond "better start building more prisons".

The typical response? "Our prisons are overflowing now! Too many Americans are in jail now! We can't build more prisons!"

32 posted on 01/18/2013 6:16:55 AM PST by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

They may not be killed in body but their minds will be just as surely killed by the inculcation of the communist dogma, that is for sure.

One piece of info generally missing from all these “studies” about violence and guns is, most of the criminal gun violence is done by repeat offenders. Seems to me if there were a punishment certain for using a fire arm in the commission of a violent felony, and by certain I mean death, gun violence would go down. Yet we hear nothing about doing this from His Excellency.

Of course this would do little to mitigate the potential for some nut job doing what happened in Conn. However, one must weigh the benefits of proactive mental health testing verses privacy and freedom issues. Matt Towery has an article about this in the paper today with more info about why this is a bad idea.

So the upshot here is the creature in the whitehouse has decided to wreck the second amendment in a two pronged approach....ban most weapons in common usage today AND make it as hard as possible for anyone to acquire any firearms through an elaborate bureaucratic maze. His myopic approach is similar to that of his nuclear arms ideas: get rid of them and then we don’t have to worry about them. I wish he felt the same about illegal aliens.


33 posted on 01/18/2013 6:19:56 AM PST by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

Have not read your entire piece but I have a minor disagreement with your beginning. In my opinion, it did not start in the 60’s. The 60’s is a too convienent scapegoat. It basically started with the push of socialism - or if you want to call it progress politics - back in the 1800’s. Those with socialistic beliefs started infiltrating government - from grass roots on up to the Fed level - and started chipping away at our Constitution and belief system.


34 posted on 01/18/2013 6:30:06 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Liberals crack me up

You want to see a Leftist really flip out? Show him some stats on how many violent felons are children of welfare moms. Make the point that we would have far less violence if welfare didn't enable underclass single women to have so many dysfunctional kids.

35 posted on 01/18/2013 6:44:07 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
How to reduce gun violence:

Stop the "War on Drugs(TM)"; Restore lunatic control to its pre-1970 state as Charles Krauthammer suggests; Outlaw and ban the demoKKKrat party.

36 posted on 01/18/2013 7:03:58 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

The answer to all of our troubles is a 3 part concoction: Attentive father + Gospel of Jesus + Lots of investment of time.


37 posted on 01/18/2013 7:10:54 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

I am so sorry that you got such a disrespectful and nasty response from your daughter. She has the Liberal Talking Points down pat, even quoting George Carlin as a “Moral Authority”. My heart goes out to you.

Please take comfort in the fact that there IS hope, as I was an extremely rebellious teen, a “flower child”, socialist, agnostic, angry, grievance-driven, trial to my loving parents.

They must have prayed for me, because now I am a Conservative, Tea-Party, Evangelical, Christian, FReeper who posts two daily prayer threads on FR.

And...I read your essay and agree with you.

“Take Heart, and Fear not. Let not your heart be troubled, for I have overcome the world”....Jesus.


38 posted on 01/18/2013 7:22:19 AM PST by left that other site (Worry is the darkroom that developes negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

Quote:
“323 death attributed to Guns”

I *think* that is ‘long guns’.
Between Chicago and Detroit they probably have more than
323 gun deaths (although I do no know that for fact).


39 posted on 01/18/2013 7:27:36 AM PST by Verbosus (/* No Comment */)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

You,of course are 100% correct and judging by some of the replies so is God.

“Many shall be purified,and made white,and tried;but the wicked shall do wickedly:and none of the wicked shall understand;but the wise shall understand” Daniel CH.12 v.10


40 posted on 01/18/2013 7:30:10 AM PST by logitech (Who's here so vile, that will not love his country? If any speak, for him I have offended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson