Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This article is a couple of days old, but I thought it was worth some discussion.

California minimum wage is $8.00 an hour. Apparently the voters of the city of Long Beach decided that hotel workers deserve to make $13.00 an hour. The voters didn't arrange to pay the increased wages themselves, but determined that the hotel owners needed to pay the increased wages.

To me, it seemed very predictable that people would lose their jobs due to this ballot initiative, but apparently some union leaders and elected officials were surprised that some hotels laid off employees.

It apparently did not occur to the union leaders that hotel owners do not have to do business in Long Beach, they can close down and cease to do business.

1 posted on 12/18/2012 8:39:40 PM PST by jeannineinsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jeannineinsd

MERRY CHRISTMAS, IDIOTS!.........


2 posted on 12/18/2012 8:45:28 PM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd; null and void

Cause and effect is such an easy thing to understand


4 posted on 12/18/2012 9:10:02 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

Those souls that retain their jobs will be facing burn out within a few months. When the hotels are forced to close, the socialists will preach about how it was another failure of capitalism.


5 posted on 12/18/2012 9:12:12 PM PST by oyez (Hell must be a Gun Free Zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

They forgot to pass Points One and Two of Directive 10-289:

In the name of the general welfare, to protect the people’s security, to achieve full equality and total stability, it is decreed for the duration of the national emergency that:

Point One. All workers, wage earners and employees of any kind whatsoever shall henceforth be attached to their jobs and shall not leave nor be dismissed nor change employment, under penalty of a term in jail. The penalty shall be determined by the Unification Board, such Board to be appointed by the Bureau of Economic Planning and National Resources. All persons reaching the age of twenty-one shall report to the Unification Board, which shall assign them to where, in its opinion, their services will best serve the interests of the nation.

Point Two. All industrial, commercial, manufacturing and business establishments of any nature whatsoever shall henceforth remain in operation, and the owners of such establishments shall not quit nor leave nor retire, nor close, sell or transfer their business, under penalty of the nationalization of their establishment and of any and all of their property...


7 posted on 12/18/2012 9:18:37 PM PST by null and void (Going Galt: The won't of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

It’s not just the five extra dollars in each paycheck, it’s also the extra payroll taxes that have to be pulled out of the cash register. We had to reduce paychecks in order to afford the taxes when business slowed down.


8 posted on 12/18/2012 9:22:27 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd
When he walked away, the protesters followed him through the hotel chanting, "Si se puede."

How cute.

10 posted on 12/18/2012 9:29:42 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

a 65% pay raise AND, most likely, having to pay health care AND being declared “wealthy” as a “S” Corp, subject to Obama’s tax on the rich.

I see no reason why one should even keep a few rooms open let alone going to 99 from 140. You can make more money on the dole - and pay no taxes to boot


11 posted on 12/18/2012 9:30:26 PM PST by llevrok (ObamaLand - Where young people go to retire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

Maybe the union should step in and make up the difference.

LOL! I kill me sometimes.


12 posted on 12/18/2012 9:39:19 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Bathhouse Barry wants YOU to bend over for another four years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

Part of the law allowed the hotels above 99 rooms to skip the increase, if they unionized. They didn’t figure that cutting down to 99 rooms would be cheaper than unions, and that hotel managers are rational actors.


13 posted on 12/18/2012 9:43:34 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd

Most of the hotels affected are located in downtown LB, which is strictly for business as there are no tourist attractions there. Very likely most will downsize and turn the excess rooms into long term rentals or apartments.

The Queen Mary Hotel will likely close as it has been a perennial money loser. Look for the Queen Mary to be headed to the scrap heap.


14 posted on 12/18/2012 10:17:22 PM PST by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeannineinsd; mickie; flaglady47
More and more we're starting to see government by referendum, propositions and initiatives.

In short, mob rule by any other name.

Mostly because legislatures don't want to vote and get on record on controversial issues.

Leni

18 posted on 12/19/2012 5:53:09 AM PST by MinuteGal (I'm Going to Update the Name That No One Dares to Utter and I'll Use It From Now On......OBAMUNISM !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson