did you see the criteria for the joke of a hearing?
NO right to see evidence.
No right to examine the accusers before trial
No right to examine or challenge the methods of obtaining the evidence.
That was no a tria or a hearing, it was just a reading of the verdict with a chance to read a meaningless response post sentence.
Even a 100% guilty murderer had more of an opportunity for trial.
I find that hard to believe. Where is that found???
Adjudication
USADA has developed and instituted an adjudication program that is fair and credible when an athlete is found to be in violation of anti-doping rules and regulations. USADA’s adjudication process relies on an American Arbitration Association (AAA)/Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) arbitrated hearing under modified AAA Commercial Rules.
The objectives of the USADA adjudication system are to provide a process which:
is fair to athletes
has international credibility
provides for a full evidentiary hearing before experienced, internationally recognized arbitrators
decreases the likelihood that an athlete will be subject to subsequent proceedings initiated by an International Federation; and
eliminates the NGBs involvement in sanctioning their own athletes
http://www.usada.org/adjudication/