[Uncle Chip]

I find that hard to believe. Where is that found???

[longtermmemmory]

it has been on all the early threads, it was in armstrong’s laywer’s statement when he anounced he was not going to fight. It was in the court case he filed to object to the methods of the “hearing” when he was demanding a more due process system.

It just makes you wonder just “WHY?” this anti-doping group is so darn scared of an open and fair (see due process) hearing on destroying someone’s reputation after SEVEN years.

BTW test samples are only kept for seven years....hmmmmmmmmm.

[1rudeboy]

I find that hard to believe. Where is that found???

It's found under the Chapter titled, "Confirmation Bias: Pre-Hearing Attorney Statements Always Outweigh Evidence if You are so Inclined."

You can find it in the mythical pro-Armstrong book, on the shelf next to the USADA report that no one has read.