To: Tanniker Smith; ApplegateRanch; Chode
These are not *from* the 11th century, they are from 3000 years ago, but were found *under* some 11th c structures.
17 posted on
07/08/2012 2:33:04 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
i think the mummy reference was a mistake
18 posted on
07/08/2012 2:45:27 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: SunkenCiv
True; but that is still no excuse for calling skeletal remains “mummies”. No soft tissue at all.
19 posted on
07/08/2012 3:22:41 PM PDT by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson