Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tanniker Smith; ApplegateRanch; Chode

These are not *from* the 11th century, they are from 3000 years ago, but were found *under* some 11th c structures.


17 posted on 07/08/2012 2:33:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
i think the mummy reference was a mistake
18 posted on 07/08/2012 2:45:27 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

True; but that is still no excuse for calling skeletal remains “mummies”. No soft tissue at all.


19 posted on 07/08/2012 3:22:41 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson