Replies

To: All

On second reading:

I think Dr. Kaplan’s piece is pure sarcasm aimed at the “bioethics” nanny-staters.

Good sarcasm, too.

I apologize to the good Doctor, and take back my medieval punishment suggestion too!

18 posted on 06/26/2012 12:24:39 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)

To: Nervous Tick

I think Dr. Kaplan’s piece is pure sarcasm aimed at the “bioethics” nanny-staters.

Bingo!

28 posted on 06/26/2012 12:30:07 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)

To: Nervous Tick

That’s how I took it too. He’s not actually arguing for it but trying to point out the slippery slope...

38 posted on 06/26/2012 12:50:22 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)

To: Nervous Tick

I think Dr. Kaplan’s piece is pure sarcasm aimed at the “bioethics” nanny-staters.

Replace cats with "homo sexuals" and watch 'em howel...I mean meow!

41 posted on 06/26/2012 12:58:49 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio - http://www.istandwithrush.org/)

To: Nervous Tick

Good for you!

A lot of cat folks here are raising H#LL! He picked a subject (cats) that a lot of people feel strongly about, myself included. Teehee!!!!

I hope these folks realize the real subject of this article - nanny state fascism.

51 posted on 06/26/2012 2:05:08 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794