West's Communist Comments 'Referring to ... the Congressional Progressive Caucus'
When you use and abuse words, then after a while they lose their meaning, lose their punch. And so it is with this mindless title. Who in history in all honesty deserves to be called "marxist communist socialist"? Who called himself that and who might be called that?
On this site it's come to the point where anyone that anyone else dislikes, out there or on this forum is labeled, yes, "marxist communist socialist".
The question doesn't deserve an answer.
That said, I believe that Obumster is in fact a marxist, in the 21st century sense, in that one suspects he reads and follows the writings of academic marxists, whom he professed to admire and associate with in his ghostwritten memoirs. But yes, the "progressives" of today are not the same as Teddy Roosevelt's progressives, and are all too similar to the socialists of Europe, or perhaps the Communists there, all of them organized in political parties of those names ("Greens" sometimes.) But whatcha gonna do in a stubburnly two party system? You infiltrate one of the parties, it doesn't matter which one, they are both for good things and against bad, those are exactly their only principles, and pretend that you belong, as no one will kick you out of the party as they would in multi-party systems.
The True Blue Romneyites are butchering this thread. Hilarious. I wonder if anyone over there is paid by Romney or the GOP to bash this place and come here and defend Mitt with that nobody but Mitt nonsense.