West's Communist Comments 'Referring to ... the Congressional Progressive Caucus'
YES- mittens is a commie just like hussein
Not to mention a gay rights champion and a gun grabber.
Neither of these culture of death weirdos are true Communists. Hussein is a Syndicalist. Willard is a Corporatist. Both are statists, as are both parties.
That's the record. Anything else beyond that is wishful thinking.
Much like Obama, we can argue all day over how to classify Romney. I don’t give a wit about his rhetoric because his record tells me he’s an immoral lying statist of one stripe or another, so he won’t get my vote.
That said, I’m not sure we know who Romney really is or what he really believes about anything. My theory is that his entire life has been about garnering power to the ultimate glory of the LDS church. I think he set out to make a lot of money to position himself for politics. For Myth, the White House was always in view. He took whatever position he believed necessary for political advantage, not out of principle.
Are you working to get Obama re-elected?
He is an connected elite. He has ties to the men behind the curtain. He will take America down the path to their hands of the NWO just like the past 4 Presidents. They are all tied to the same people. They work for them and not for us.
Maybe, but not half as much as Obama.
On one hand, we have Bishop Willard from Planet Kolob.
On the other, the illegitimate, bisexual, Marxist Kenyan Muslim Usurper.
Both appoint activist judges, both support the Lavendar Mafia, both grab guns, both support the murder of babies, both want socialized medicine.
"Republicans vs. Democrats: Maybe A Dime's Worth Of Difference"
~ Larry Elder, "The Ten Things You Can't Say In America"
I want to defend Mitt Romney.
HE is not a Communist.
I wouldn’t go so far as to call him a marxist but its only a matter of degree. He’s a global socialist who is picking up a lot of Bammy’s marxist support.
that's how he got the bad rap, with his statements during the gubernatorial race in Mass-of-2-$h!t$.
truth be known, we wont know the truth until after he gets elected.
but considering what we have now, I am all for him....we cant have 4 more years of a KNOWN marxist who is a lame duck.....
Are you on an anti-Mittens roll this morning?
(yes)
A little actual knowledge goes a long way. Words have meanings.
Progressive is the 1920s expression the communist agenda used to avoid being called socialist or communist. Progressives, once exposed, replaced pogressive with the word liberal.
Obama's socialist agenda for America exposed the liberal agenda of his enablers and they began to seek refuge under the progressive label.
It is time to reconsider your political position when you find yourself to ashamed to admit the label your political position caused.
You think it is cool to say the most outrageous things about the legitimately elected nominee, Mitt Romney because our top patriot, Jim Robinson, is opposed to him. I think good scrutiny is a good thing, which is what is being encouraged. However, I do not like unsupported comments out of the ballpark.
For crying out loud. No.
Next question...
This is no time to desert our champion, no matter how flawed.
We have the choice between a new election in four years or an new election when Obama dies.
Your choice, mes ami's.
I’m prepared to come to grips with the simple fact that I’m voting against a Marxist, Communist who doesn’t know anything else, has never believed anything else, and never been indoctrinated into anything else. That isn’t Mitt. Mitt, at least, has an understanding of the private sector, how it works, what it needs, of its importance, not so Obama. While compromised by progressive drivel and PC, Mitt knows there’s another world out there, and he knows he has to play in that world now to be successful. Mitt can work with a Republican House and Senate, one that is trending conservative. Obama can’t, and he won’t, not that we will have to worry about it after January. Then we will have to worry about Mitt, and I’ll breath a sigh of relief. We’ll have someone who loves America back in the White House. For certain he won’t be the ideal, conservative choice, but we might get surprised. We might see some pro growth tax policies. We will see Janet Napolitano and Eric Holder out of government, and all of Obama’s commie, anti American friends with them. I bet we see some pretty conservative people taking some of their places. We will probably see some pro drilling, pro oil, pro energy for America policies, and quickly. Yeah Romney’s PC, but he knows what fills the tanks of America’s cars, and unlike Obama, he cares about something besides his own tank. In fact, for me, there is no choice. When it comes to Romney, I would rather go with just about any of the above, but they aren’t there. So yeah, I get the games. Is Romney a commie because he has been a progressive like Nixon, or like Bush with his “kinder, gentler America? It’s okay with me if you think so, but he sure as hell isn’t a commie like Obama. Sometimes I wonder if the biggest fear some conservatives have about Romney is if he will turn out to be a good, successful president, who is good for America. What a horror that would be. But I’m willing to risk it. He is better than Obama, and that is the only choice on the table, like it or not.
No