Posted on 09/06/2011 1:47:37 PM PDT by Palter
Here is why there are no glyphs inside the Great Pyramid:
http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/articles/02/1015144.html
Fascinating about the C-46’s still operating. The ghosts of many other C-46’s kept them flying.
I remember near Harrisburg PA around 1964 seeing where someone had made a home out of a C-46 fuselage, set into a hillside on a cinder block foundation. As a kid I thought that was kind of neat.
There was a huge story about surplus disposal after WWII in Smithsonian. Military aircraft were sold not individually, but by entire airfields full.
The aircrews who flew them and got mustered out by the thousands felt pretty surplus, too.
Even those archaeologists who still stubbornly subscribe to the tomb theory of the pyramid...That would be a list of every actual Egyptologist. Not just most, every single one. I'm not sure of the number of people who stubbornly cling to the idea that the pyramids weren't constructed as pharaonic tombs.
...do not believe that a queen or anyone else was ever buried in the limestone chamber.The smaller, lower chamber probably held grave goods, and canopic jars. It, along with the burial chamber, were probably robbed in antiquity. During construction, there was a serious structural problem of some kind. Houdin et al attribute this to a settling of one side of the pyramid due to the immense weight of the structure. The corbels at the top of the Grand Gallery were found (by Petrie I think) to be holding on by less than an inch on one end, due to the shift (whatever its cause; used to be attributed to an earthquate). The pyramid was nearing completion -- the top half of the pyramid contains, hmm, about 1/9th of the mass, uh, I'd better get someone else to look at that -- and the chief architect had an inspection shaft dug from the top of the Grand Gallery to the first of the upper relieving chambers. In modern times the other relieving chambers were tunnelled into from the lowest one.
...the top half of the pyramid contains, hmm, about 1/9th of the mass, uh, I'd better get someone else to look at that...
Hmmm. I think you may have been fooled by that tricky 1/3 term in the formula for the volume of a pyramid.
V_total = (1/3) x h x B
(B, being the area of the base, h the height).
If we lop off the top half of the pyramid, the resulting solid has half the height, and the area of the base will be one fourth as great, since its two linear dimensions scale proportionally, the volume of the top half of the pyramid is
V_top = (1/3) x (h/2) x (B/4) = V_total/8
This relationship should hold regardless of shape of the base and whether or not the stack ascends vertically, think of a leaning pyramid of Pisa.
For the actual pyramid, the mass may well not be proportional to the volume, since the lower parts of it are honeycombed with passages, the upper part may well represent more than one eigth of the total mass.
1/8, that’s right... the pyramid is 99% solid masonry (give or take any unknown chambers or Houdin’s internal ramp theory), so the 1/8 is pretty close.
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.