Posted on 05/16/2011 3:00:41 PM PDT by decimon
Maybe it's a matter of scale. When northern Europe had tribes, it had chiefs and subordinates. When it coalesced into nations, it had kings and aristocracies.
I like some of the Teaching Company stuff, but some of it is piss-poor (I’ve checked some out of the local library in the past), and it’s pricey.
Twins? Alright! I just hope that IMF guy’s never been in Iceland.
They were an anarcho-syndicalist commune. They took it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.But all the decisions of that officer had to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs—but by a two-thirds majority in the case of external matters.
In the Icelandic Free State, the aristocrats had to compete for the allegiance of the farmers. If a farmer felt that the baron was not offering adequate protection, or was charging too much taxes, he was free to find another baron.
You win the best double post of the day contest. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.