Posted on 04/19/2011 7:15:26 AM PDT by Realman30
Why didn’t you fire her and demand an American nurse?
I sure wouldn’t trust one of ‘em to care for a loved one of mine.
BTW, there’s no such thing as a moderate MuSLIME
Flippin idiot retards
Oh. The Malcolm X kind.
I can see that. Dogs are all about unconditional love. You can’t have that kinda stuff messin with our message of hate and violence now can ya?
Hadith 3813 seems to back this up somewhat in that Mohammed, after relenting on his initial dog-killing opinion, kept it in place specifically for the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes), for it is a devil.
Dogs with those particular markings are considered by Zoroastrians to be the dogs that guide human spirits to the afterlife/heaven.
I love the way you put that, I couldn’t agree more.
They are evil and sick.
Here is an article about dogs & their historical treatment by Moslems in Iran, excerpts of which are below:
Mary Boyce, Professor Emeritus of Iranian Studies and a pre-eminent scholar of Zoroastrianism, spent a 12-month sabbatical in 1963-64 living in the Zoroastrian community of Iran (mostly in Sharifabad, on the northern Yazdi plain). During a lecture series given at Oxford in 1975, she noted how the Iranian ancestors of the Zoroastrians had a devoted working relationship (i.e., herding livestock) with dogs when they lived a nomadic existence on the Asian steppes. This sustained contact evolved over generations such that dogs became a part in (Zoroastrian) religious beliefs and practices which in due course became a part of the heritage of Zoroastrianism.
Boyce then provided an historical overview of the deliberate, wanton cruelty of Muslims and their children towards dogs in Iran, including a personal eyewitness account:
In Sharifabad the dogs distinguished clearly between Moslem and Zoroastrian, and were prepared to go, full of hope, into a crowded Zoroastrian assembly, or to fall asleep trustfully in a Zoroastrian lane, but would flee as before Satan from a group of Moslem boys. The evidence points to Moslem hostility to these animals having been deliberately fostered in the first place in Iran, as a point of opposition to the old (pre-Islamic jihad conquest) faith (i.e., Zoroastrianism) there. Certainly in the Yazdi area. Moslems found a double satisfaction in tormenting dogs, since they were thereby both afflicting an unclean creature and causing distress to the infidel who cherished him.
There are grim stories from the time (i.e., into the latter half of the 19th century) when the annual poll-tax (jizya) was exacted, of the tax gatherer tying a Zoroastrian and a dog together, and flogging both alternately until the money was somehow forthcoming, or death released them.
I myself was spared any worse sight than that of a young Moslem girl standing over a litter of two-week old puppies, and suddenly kicking one as hard as she could with her shod foot. The puppy screamed with pain, but at my angry intervention she merely said blankly But it’s unclean. In Sharifabad I was told by distressed Zoroastrian children of worse things: a litter of puppies cut to pieces with a spade-edge, and a dog’s head laid open with the same implement; and occasionally the air was made hideous with the cries of some tormented animal.
Must mention that the above treatment by Iranian-Moslems is Not the norm. It usually only applies to either uneducated & very religious Iranian-Moslems, who, w/out questioning it, follow every word that the moslem clergy in Iran tell/have told them, and/or those who've mental problems w/ sadistic tendencies.
This way, during the next crackdown, when the regime cuts off the movement of normal food shipments, its victims won’t be able to eat the dog food (or the dog). Thanks Realman30.
Additional:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2707719/posts
Better plan: outlaw the Muslims, and keep the dogs.
It appears dogs also hate Muslims.
Anything evil is usually detected by, and hated by, dogs.
No more proof this is a evil bunch needed for me. ANYONE who hates dogs is pure evil!!!!!
Methodists.
Your comment at best is crass.
Have a terrific Easter.
“railing against “short-legged” and “holdable” dogs. “
The type of dogs that women would be more likely to own?
If only. . .
Bump. . .just call the MO, the ‘tough love’ of Moral Reason.
Get this Mommand was cat owner I don’t get it LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.