Posted on 12/02/2010 1:58:18 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March
This is not a thread for light browsing. This will wear out anyone, links that make me wish I were twenty people at once.
Here are some research aids:
Dogpile Search [searches google, bing and other other engines simultaneously.]
All the following are Free Republic Forum Pages. Most are link lists for referening:
Where's Obama's Birth Certificate? We are winning the debate. Here's why -- a plain spoken summary.
Monster Ping [earlier deep research]
Monster Ping [earlier deep research, now more concentrated on shockers]
Close Encounters with the Loony Left
Thug-0-crat hit list [shocking links and headlines]
quick quote of liz:
“The Arkansas-based Clinton Library also raises huge amounts of money from Muslim Mideast sources.”
Feds: High-tech smuggling ring sent US electronics to Russian spy, military agencies
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3477710/posts
Archiving your post here.
Wikileaks Releases Hillary Clinton Podesta Emails
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3477816/posts?page=55#55
[I’ll next post it word-for-word. Thank you.
[quote]
A snippet from Assange.
- - - -
“As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.
When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.
Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).
In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”
What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.
— Red Steel
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3477816/posts?page=55#55
Research by SSS Two ...
[quote]
Here’s a good one. Link. Read the whole thing ... Emphasis added and redacted for brevity:
==
Iran Nuclear Deal
From:seizenstat@cov.com
To: Jake.Sullivan@gmail.com
Date: 2015-06-22 04:23
Subject: Iran Nuclear Deal
Dear Jake,
I have sent several detailed notes on the Iran nuclear deal, and will avoid repetition. But with the June 30 deadline fast approaching (although it may be extended), and with Hillary certain to be pressed on whether she supports the deal and will urge Congress not to disapprove it, I wanted to share a few thoughts.
1. This could well be a voting issue for many moderates in the Jewish community. The mainstream organized leadership will almost certainly oppose the deal, along with Israel and all the Republican candidates, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and perhaps Egypt.
2. While we cannot be sure until there is a final agreement, it appears that many of the open issues since the preliminary accord, may be resolved in Iran’s favor:
(1) Enriched uranium will stay in Iran for dilution, rather than be sent to Russia or France for reprocessing.
(2) Sanctions will not be phased-out commensurate with compliance, as the US Fact Sheet indicated after the last “agreement”, but may come off more quickly. This will transfer billions to Iran and enhance its funding for terrorism and its efforts to gain hegemony in the region.
(3) It is not clear what Iran will be required to do on PMD, if anything. This was required of Iraq by the UNSC in September 2002. Iran should be held to the same standard. They have yet to answer 11 of the 12 IAEA questions, yet UN sanctions will be lifted.
(4) Russia, China and Iran itself may be able to block “snapback” sanctions if there is a violation of the agreement. US companies will be disadvantaged compared to European companies, since many US non-nuclear sanctions will remain, while all EU sanctions are nuclear-related.
(5) Military sites (Parchin) are likely to be off the table for inspections.
(6) Iran will likely be able to do research on advanced centrifuges, which enrich more uranium more rapidly than the current generation. This would markedly reduce the breakout time in the last years of the accord. Presidenr Obama has conceded this point (e.g. David Sanger article in NYT, April 8, 2015)
(7) Iran will have an industrial size nuclear program, and will be left as a “nuclear capable state”.
(8) Iran will be able to keep 1000 centrifuges at Fordo.
(9) Nothing in the agreement will limit its support for terrorism.
— SSS Two [unquote]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3477816/posts?page=41#41
Response by Liz to both posts above ...
[quote]
This gambit by Bill Clinton (meddling in a foreign election) got the uranium scheme going. Bill’s calculated handshake was a bonanza for the Kazahk president’s re-election. Nazarbayev responded in kind and signed-off on the initial phase of the US uranium assets takeover.
Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev greets former
president Clinton (L) in Almaty on September 6, 2005.
CIRCA 2015 A Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter claims that former President Bill Clinton falsely denied hosting a meeting with Kazakh officials when she tried to write a story that involved his foundation several years ago.
Jo Becker, who works on the newspaper’s investigative desk, said Clinton only confirmed the meeting took place after she informed him there were photographs.
Clinton’s role in a deal that involved Kazakhstan, the Russian government, and a man who donated millions to the president’s charitable foundation were detailed in a story Becker published on Thursday.
That article revisited some of her earlier reporting and included information from the upcoming book “Clinton Cash,” which is generating widespread headlines amid a flurry of reports suggesting it will raise serious questions about Clinton’s family foundation.
The donor in question is Canadian mining executive Frank Giustra, a longtime friend of the former president who has given tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation in the past few years. (A couple of hours after the NYT story was published, Giustra issued a defiant statement. We’ve included that below.)
Becker initially wrote about the February 2007 meeting between Clinton, Giustra, and executives from the state-owned nuclear company Kazatomprom in 2008. The gathering took place at Clinton’s home in Chappaqua, New York.
“When I first contacted both the Clinton foundation — Mr. Clinton’s spokesman — and Mr. Giustra, they denied any such meeting ever took place,” Becker recalled in footage aired by Fox News on Thursday.
However, Becker said Clinton and Giustra both changed their stories after she confronted them with evidence to the contrary.
“And then when we told them, ‘Well we already talked to the head of Kazatomprom, who not only told us all about the meeting, but actually has a picture of him and Bill at the home in Chappaqua, and that he proudly displayed on his office wall.’ They then acknowledged that yes, the meeting had taken place,” Becker continued in the television interview.
The purpose of the meeting, then Kazatomprom President Moukhtar Dzhakishev told The Times, was to discuss Kazakhstan potentially buying a 10% stake in Westinghouse, a US nuclear company. Becker’s 2008 story also noted one of Giustra’s companies secured a deal to buy uranium deposits from Kazatomprom in 2005.
That agreement was made after Clinton accompanied Giustra on a trip to Kazakhstan. During the trip, Giustra and Clinton met with Kazakhstan’s President Nursultan Nazarbayev.
Clinton issued a public statement praising the Kazakh leader despite his questionable, antidemocratic record. The Times called the praise a “propaganda coup” for Nazarbayev. (he later “won relection” w/ an unbelievable 90% of the vote)
“Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle,” wrote Becker and another reporter, Don Van Natta.
A spokesperson for the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership told Business Insider they are “working on a formal statement” in response to a request for comment on Thursday. Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership is an initiative of the Clinton Foundation that was cofounded by Clinton and Giustra in 2007. A Clinton Foundation spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nyt-reporter-clinton-lied-about-meeting-2015-48/25
— liz
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3477816/posts?page=75#75
Bill Clinton Took Twice As Many Flights On ‘Pedophile Island’ Billionaire’s ‘Lolita Express’ Than Previously Reported
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3477942/posts
Pentagon Considers Launching Limited Military Action Against Assad [Reuters]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3477977/posts
Four possible reasons why Obama wants to take out a secular government in the Middle East even though it has determined support from Russia:
*
1. Wag the dog.
*
2. To help the Saudis with a natural gas pipeline
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2636478/posts?page=2297#2297
[hat tip to henkster]
*
3. A hatred of Christians that runs fanatically deep.
*
4. A combination of 1, 2, and/or 3.
Experts said Arctic sea ice would melt entirely by Sept ‘16...
French Gvmt Announces Plan to Criminalize Websites Opposing Abortion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478284/posts
After Paul Ryan called for Trump to step down from the race, the House Speaker was shouted down at a rally.
Another way ISIS helps the Clintons and Obama ....
[quote]
Qatar could also use a pipeline across Syria [which Assad blocks], and according to research by Liz they donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation:
Has the Clinton Foundation gotten money from Qatar?
The Clinton Family Foundation and the Clinton Library in Arkansas received millions from Muslim Qatar (as well as donations from FIFA, the soccer organization now enmeshed in a bribery and corruption).
ITEM The Clinton/Muslim connection is yuuuge. The conniving Clintons were more than willing to take money from oppressive regimes while Hillary was sitting pretty in the State Department catbird seat.
Then-Secy Hillary approved arms sales that enhanced military power of known terrorist countries. Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar .... repressive countries singled out for corruption, and civil liberties violations, to violent crackdowns against political opponents.........
ITEM 181 Clinton Foundation donors lobbied Hillary’s State Department for political favors.
ITEM Michele talked about “teaching Muslim girls,” then Obama sent her off to oil-rich Muslim Quatar w/ $73 million US tax dollars. Just recently, he gave Michele 100 million dollars tax dollars to give Muslim Morocco to teach Muslim girls (the 100 million came out of Hillary’s state Dept slush fund——the Millenium Challenge Corp.)
— liz
[more has been added above, and more will be added within the hour]
Drudge on top of new Hillary revelations:
~~~~~
Hacked emails show excerpts of Hillary Goldman Sachs speeches...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/podesta-emails-show-excerpts-of-clinton-speeches-to-goldman/
She Dreams Of ‘Open Trade and Open Borders’...
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-dump-hillary-dreams-open-trade-open-borders/
‘You need both public and private position’...
http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-emails-clinton-private-speech-trade-2016-10
Sanders supporters seethe...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/sanders-supporters-seethe-over-clintons-leaked-remarks-wall-225213392.html
2,000 Messages From Podesta Exposed...
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/07/wikileaks-publishes-two-thousand-emails-from-clinton-campaign-chair-john-podesta/
Campaign Coordinating With Soros Org...
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/07/leaked-emails-show-clinton-campaign-coordinating-with-soros-organization
**** CLINTONS’ SOUL-CRUSHING EVILS ***
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478032/posts
Thread above deleted because it was a wikipedia source.
I thought it was very candid of Wikipedia to agree that the Clintons do indeed have a tainted prison blood scandal. It was well written and well-footnoted, and Wikipedia is very skeptical of democrat scandals. They ‘crossed the aisle’ on that one.
But ... I understand the caution and will write a ‘vanity’ along the same lines.
The Clinton Tainted Prison Blood Scandal
Long and short: Clinton’s good buddy, Leonard Dunn, sold prison blood to Canada and other nations.
It was illegal to sell it in the US but Governor Bill Clinton used the state’s prisons to get that blood anyway.
A lot of people got really messed up with hepatitis C and AIDS.
Now the Clintons want control of the USA’s healthcare system.
Current rough draft:
The Soul Crushing Truth about the Clintons — lowest people in US history
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478292/posts?page=8#8
Pence condemns Trump?
A hoax?
~~~
Trump refuses to quit as Melania and Pence condemn comments ...
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DyOl880YKdqw&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwis5_Ds5c3PAhXBqh4KHXT7CiMQtwIINTAK&usg=AFQjCNFXQA1GjxylsZ4zAxl8372D8bk7zw
~~~
I can’t load youtube. So I don’t know what to make of this.
A hoax?
[UK] Daily Mail
Rumors Mike Pence is under GOP pressure to quit as Trump’s running mate
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3829081/Mike-Pence-says-offended-Trump-s-crude-remarks.html
I think Melania condemned the comments but then said she supports him I his apology and that isn’t the man she has come to know...paraphrasing there. But the way the headline is worded makes it sound like she is hunkering down with Angelina Jolie and calling a team of divorce lawyers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.