[curiosity]

Sorry, my friend, but the burden of proof is on you to prove that somehow "African" was unacceptable in 1961.

If it is accetable today, then the presumption, until proven otherwise, is that it was acceptable then.

[Red Steel]

Sorry, my friend, but the burden of proof is on you to prove that somehow "African" was unacceptable in 1961.

I see that you can't find anything to prove you are correct.

[Las Vegas Ron]

If it is accetable today, then the presumption, until proven otherwise, is that it was acceptable then.

Using that logic, I guess Paul Tibbits' mother was homosexual

[Red Steel]

If it is accetable today, then the presumption, until proven otherwise, is that it was acceptable then.

No Un-curious that "presumption" is correct. Here is a blast from the past that says it is correct:

- - - - - -

" "Hey guys! Guess what?"(Another huge clue about Obama's fake birth certificate-true!)
The Obama File.com ^ | July 28, 2009 | No Name Listed

Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:51:18 PM by Stayfree

Page 231 contains the requirements for "Race and color."

"Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and "other nonwhite."

Do you see a classification for "African?" I certainly don't.

Now, let's look at the document that Obama has provided for certifying his eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States and that is displayed on Annenberg FatCheck.org.

FATHER'S RACE is "African" -- an incorrect entry for that data field. Just a typo? I don't think so. The Obot who created the bogus Certification of Live Birth just couldn't type the word "Negro." Negro is just not politically correct, don'tcha know."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2303787/posts

- - - - - - - - -