Posted on 06/07/2010 1:39:25 PM PDT by JoeProBono
THANKS
Some are quite amused when naysayers flaunt
their ignorance.
WRONG assumptions again.
My relative worked around a fairly famous physicist
involved with highly classified projects in NV.
THAT physicist certainly agreed with Stanton.
Evidently you need to trade YOUR physicist in on a new one not so full of the government swill.
You have indeed lived up to my fullest expectations with your decidedly predictable response.
THAT would be an interesting statistical analysis . . . as well as would the data collection.
LOL.
Unless you just pulled it out of your hat . . .
which seems kind of obvious.
I aim to please.
You aim, too, please.
Look at the squiggly lines around the craft ... this photo would be shot down in 20 seconds by any expert at all
Then look in the mirror, you’ll find one.
BTW, I guess Stephen Hawking is a paid government shill as well. Of course for the delusional believers in UFO’s as aliens, all genuine reputable scientists are “government shills.”
I’m curious how many additions to your home have had to be added on to accommodate a ballooning ego?
Odd that you use Hawking, considering he is fairly sympathetic to the possibility of alien visitors. Most cosmologists agree that it is a virtual certainty that life exists elsewhere in the universe. Whether or not they have visited earth is the debate.
Most naysayers are
VERY BEHIND THE CURVE
on
—physics
—reality
—news
—research
and here . . . on Hawking who recently came out firmly in support of such notions as ET’s etc.
It is likely because they spend so much time basking in the radiance of their mirrors that they have no time to keep up on the news.
I tutored Physics in college and have been working at Intel designing microprocessors for the last 20 years.
We deal with Physics problems every day.
Do I believe there is life on other planets outside of our solar system...sure it would be illogical to not think so.
Science is based on creating a theory and then submitting it for review to be examined for flaws.
If we are to confront people like Al Gore with the requirement to place his book under a peer review, we must also requre it of others who we might support.
I LOVE SciFi (ie my handle) but I refuse to let my love distract me from questioning and asking “why”.
"Odd that you use Hawking, considering he is fairly sympathetic to the possibility of alien visitors."OH REALLY? Funny, I recall him saying the exact opposite. Like in his lecture Life In The Universe?
"I discount suggestions that UFO's contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens, would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant."Yeah, I see your as accurate as your brother delusionals.
"What is the explanation of why we have not been visited? One possibility is that the argument, about the appearance of life on Earth, is wrong. Maybe the probability of life spontaneously appearing is so low, that Earth is the only planet in the galaxy, or in the observable universe, in which it happened. Another possibility is that there was a reasonable probability of forming self reproducing systems, like cells, but that most of these forms of life did not evolve intelligence."
I am discounting reports of UFOs. Why would they appear only to cranks and weirdos?
Got tin?
Frankly, I thought your comment was very sagacious.
My reaction as well, I read his other (previous) posts . . . definitely a “true believer.”
Are you Zathras, or his brother Zathras? :)
Ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.