1 posted on
02/05/2010 7:31:57 AM PST by
Palter
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
02/05/2010 7:32:30 AM PST by
Palter
(Kilroy was here.)
To: Palter
So, it was either Krakatoa exploding or two massive asteroid strikes that caused the Dark Ages? Cool!!!!
To: Palter
I thought that was Barney Frank?
6 posted on
02/05/2010 7:38:45 AM PST by
RexBeach
("Those are my principles...if you don't like them, I have others." Groucho Marx)
To: Palter
Meteorite iron was very much in demand during the Dark Ages. It was said that swords forged of iron from heaven were invincible in battle. Legend had it that Excalibur itself was forged from meteorite iron.
7 posted on
02/05/2010 7:42:09 AM PST by
CholeraJoe
(Deja Moo - The feeling that you have heard this BS before.)
To: Palter
Uh, 11 miles is not a tiny difference. It’s like the difference between a .22 on a necklace and the 30mm Vulcan cannon.
9 posted on
02/05/2010 8:02:29 AM PST by
wastedyears
(The curtain has fallen, behold the messiah.)
To: Palter
“Paging Velikosky. Paging Immanuel Velikovsky. This is your medium calling...”
12 posted on
02/05/2010 8:37:47 AM PST by
LRS
(Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
To: Palter
What's more, around the same time the Roman Empire was falling apart in Europe, Aborigines in Australia may have witnessed and recorded the double impact, she said. The only historical event that is more debated than "the Extinction of the Dinosaurs" is "the Fall of Rome". Sheesh!
14 posted on
02/05/2010 9:39:51 AM PST by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: blam
Your Territory.
16 posted on
02/05/2010 10:03:16 AM PST by
Little Bill
(Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
To: Palter
If a large impactor had broken up on its final approach to Earth, he said, the fragments would still have been very, very close together when they landed: "It essentially will behave as one piece," creating a single crater, Boslough said. But if it had broken up slightly earlier -- due to solar heating, say, or gravitational stresses -- that argument loses its force.
17 posted on
02/05/2010 10:04:05 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Palter
The climate change took place around 535 AD, while the asteroid impact happened in 500 AD. Don’t know if there is any documented climate change around 500 AD.
18 posted on
02/05/2010 12:03:49 PM PST by
Ptarmigan
(Death Penalty For Bunny Rabbits!)
To: Palter; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
19 posted on
02/05/2010 4:15:30 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
To: Palter; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
20 posted on
02/05/2010 4:18:41 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
To: Palter
Abbott and colleagues argue that several climate events during the Holocene epoch11,500 years ago to the presentwere actually triggered by impacts, and therefore such large impacts are more common than currently believed. Tick, tick, tick .... tick.
25 posted on
02/05/2010 6:42:50 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(You know Obama is in trouble when the MSM mentions that he is half white.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson