Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Adhd Fraud or Who Killed Rebecca Riley?
Fred A. Baughman, Jr., MD, Neurologist, Child Neurologist ^ | 06/22/07 | Fred A. Baughman

Posted on 08/06/2007 7:18:11 AM PDT by Lennyq

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Lennyq
It's all about the money for them, kids.

1. Schools want kids to be labelled as special needs, so they can get more government funding (they get more per special needs student than per "normal" student). Period. There is no other motivation for them. It is not exactly a secret in education circles.
2. Psych workers want more influence, patients, and relevance, so they're happy to diagnose as many urchins as possible for the schools. Very few people in the world fail to qualify for some disorder under the book: DSM IV.
and...
3. Parents are usually happy that their child will get extra time, attention, and help on all assignments and tests... as well as increased responsibility for the schools, rather than for themselves. (Let's try passing a law that increases parental contributions to their child's education, and see how many suddenly oppose... I'm not saying all parents of diagnosed kids are bad/lazy/whatever, I'm just saying you'd see many change their minds once some measure of increased responsibility falls on their shoulders.)
4. Students are often happy to go along with the scheme, because it is far easier to get better grades, there's less stigma (now that everyone is getting diagnosed with something), and you get far more free time if you're "high-functioning" in the special ed classes.

41 posted on 08/06/2007 10:13:35 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

still on the “nah nah nah I can’t hear you” routine ?

Why don’t you simply respond to the facts, not your feeeeelings ?


42 posted on 08/06/2007 10:14:45 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cinives

i don’t just FEEL that scientologists are loony, it’s a fact.


43 posted on 08/06/2007 10:15:36 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cinives
One more time, then I'm done.

You don’t know what this man credentials are or what his research affiliations are; but you are willing to accept blindly someone’s assertions that he’s a Scientologist and dismiss everything he says or writes accordingly.

If.

I. said. if.

I don't know if the man has affiliations with scientology. I don't care. I have not dismissed ANYTHING he has said. He might very well do amazing, necessary and productive work.

You are reading much, much more into my posts than is actually there.

I simply said that IF the man has connections to scientology, then his credibility is diminished no matter WHO he is.

I am making a general statement about scientology, not about anything else BUT scientology. Not neurology, not psychiatry, nor the disputes or agreements between the two. I am making a general statement about SCIENTOLOGY and its utter and complete lack of merit. Nothing else.

44 posted on 08/06/2007 10:15:52 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cinives

What a lovely personal attack, when you don’t even know which side of the issue i stand on. You really are a jerk of the first class for that totally uncalled for attack. What a plain ass. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a jerky thing. You are a lowlife scumbag maggot. Piss off.


45 posted on 08/06/2007 10:20:49 AM PDT by Clam Digger (Hey Bill O'Reilly, you suck! How's that for pithy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: agrace
I have not dismissed ANYTHING he has said

No you haven't dismissed it; you've ignored it.

Go reread your posts and show me where you've even considered anything the man wrote. Everything you have posted has been about Scientology; I've been trying to direct your attention back to the article and the ideas contained therein.

46 posted on 08/06/2007 10:20:50 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Clam Digger

OK, clarify your post, then. Your first post on this thread was to call some posters idiots.

You want to start again ?


47 posted on 08/06/2007 10:21:44 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

sure ... now get let’s back to the contents of the article ...


48 posted on 08/06/2007 10:23:37 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

I don’t care a rats ass about the scientolgists and their mental problems, it’s the ignorant fools who deny the existence of ADD, ADHD and bipolar and claim all meds for treating it are bad.


49 posted on 08/06/2007 10:24:10 AM PDT by Clam Digger (Hey Bill O'Reilly, you suck! How's that for pithy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cinives

not interested. you clearly are desperate to cling to the quackery upon which you rely. i have seen it and don’t buy it. peace out.


50 posted on 08/06/2007 10:25:46 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: xsmommy

So why are you gracing this thread with your presence, then, since a discussion of the article is not of interest to you ?


52 posted on 08/06/2007 10:27:31 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cinives

i was pinged.


53 posted on 08/06/2007 10:28:29 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Clam Digger

Wow. A sane person is on this thread.


54 posted on 08/06/2007 10:32:04 AM PDT by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: half-cajun

Thanks. The thread is prety well poisoned by some psycho who is off his meds, though.


56 posted on 08/06/2007 10:34:46 AM PDT by Clam Digger (Hey Bill O'Reilly, you suck! How's that for pithy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Thanks for your contribution. The only problem with the scheme you describe is that the drugs they are prescibing to these children are no joke! Ritlan, Adderal and the like are all dangerous stimulants on par with cocaine and other illegal drugs. They all have serious side effects that I do not think anyone takes into account. In addition the children themselves may be having real problems that are not being addressed. I think this situation will go on for the time being but eventually the chickens will come home to roost!


57 posted on 08/06/2007 10:48:48 AM PDT by Lennyq (antipsychotic drugs for normal children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

A very nice summary of how it works...oo bad others can’t get the “dear old Mr. Chips” image of school administration out of their heads. And then there is the current generation of parents...


58 posted on 08/06/2007 10:56:14 AM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cinives
No you haven't dismissed it; you've ignored it.

Yes, that is correct, because my point is not about the doctor, as I keep saying. He could be a nuclear physicist, a cabaret singer or my neighbor with the cool new Mustang.

If any of the above are Scientologists, I cannot help but treat them prejudicially based on their willingness to embrace such an unmitigated farce.

Go reread your posts and show me where you've even considered anything the man wrote. Everything you have posted has been about Scientology; I've been trying to direct your attention back to the article and the ideas contained therein.

THANK YOU. You're RIGHT! My point has ALWAYS been about scientology.

Have a great afternoon, cinives. :)

59 posted on 08/06/2007 10:59:06 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lennyq

Bipolar is definitely real...but I don’t think it can be diagnosed as young as 2....

The age of 2 has been described as “the terrible 2’s” for a reason....


60 posted on 08/06/2007 11:05:57 AM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Taz Struck By Lightning Faces Battery Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson