No you haven't dismissed it; you've ignored it.
Go reread your posts and show me where you've even considered anything the man wrote. Everything you have posted has been about Scientology; I've been trying to direct your attention back to the article and the ideas contained therein.
Yes, that is correct, because my point is not about the doctor, as I keep saying. He could be a nuclear physicist, a cabaret singer or my neighbor with the cool new Mustang.
If any of the above are Scientologists, I cannot help but treat them prejudicially based on their willingness to embrace such an unmitigated farce.
Go reread your posts and show me where you've even considered anything the man wrote. Everything you have posted has been about Scientology; I've been trying to direct your attention back to the article and the ideas contained therein.
THANK YOU. You're RIGHT! My point has ALWAYS been about scientology.
Have a great afternoon, cinives. :)