Posted on 03/02/2007 3:40:30 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - A former Canadian defense minister is demanding that world governments disclose alien technology that could be used to solve the problem of climate change, a local newspaper has said. Hellyer, who served as defense minister in former prime minister Lester Pearson's cabinet in 1963, says knowing the fuel technology used by alleged aliens for driving their saucers or UFOs could eliminate the burning of fossil fuels thus saving the planet from the perils of climate change.
"I would like to see what (alien) technology there might be that could eliminate the burning of fossil fuels within a generation ... that could be a way to save our planet," the 83-year-old Hellyer, a public UFO advocate since 2005, told the Ottawa Citizen.
Hellyer said the governments should come forward and disclose the alien technology obtained during alleged UFO crashes. His appeal was in reference to the mysterious 1947 incident in Roswell, New Mexico, when the military officials declared having recovered a crashed "flying disc," a statement that was later annulled.
"We need to persuade governments to come clean on what they know. Some of us suspect they know quite a lot, and it might be enough to save our planet if applied quickly enough," he told the paper........"
(Excerpt) Read more at allheadlinenews.com ...
Put the space alien nuts in the same camp as TWA 800.
BTW, Congrats.
Great dodge on avoiding very reasonable questions.
I realize there are no answers one can provide such questions and still logically remain with your perspective but I'd thought there would at least have been some sort of valiant futile smoke screen effort pretending to be logical answers.
And what might your line be when ET's and UFO's are routinely on nightly news?
Your Gibberish is not logical, why bother?
Hey, precious buddy.
Thanks for the support. But we can't make it personal. We need you around. Keep it on the issues and arguments, not the individuals who are FREEPERS.
Sounds like Shrillery calling black white and white black
logic now equal illogic
and
sound scientific language now equal gibberish.
Cute.
Very impressive.
Such "dialogues" as these will be remembered. Those memories will heighten the chagrin on that very interesting day . . . or night . . . as the case may be. Would love to see the face. LOL. At least there will be quite a group of FREEPERS with similar expressions and dropped jaws.
I might believe the US Government was involved with the TWA 800.
If you ever get a clue as to what "sound scientific" means, get back to me.
Meanwhile I have decided to give up listening to or reading your gibberish for Lent.
It's abundantly clear that DILLDO KLINTOON WAS up to his BJ in covering that up to enhance his reelection.
He also had a ACOA obsessions of desperately needing the whole nation--the whole world to love and adore him. He couldn't tolerate such truths coming to light on his watch. He was very significantly involved in that coverup. There's plenty of evidence on that score.
imho.
Sound scientific means, for one thing . . .
that when a scientific measurement is taken
something
is either there
or it isn't there
or it's partially there.
Then one gets into levels of significance testing to see if the measurements are likely due to chance or way beyond chance.
But that's probably complex enough for this lesson.
Resting for lent is probably very advisable after so much brain work.
Woe! Exposed! Hot tears of shame roll down my face! Guilt wells up within me, making me not want to live anymore!
Recent report from the voice of the martyrs : 2 chinese women beaten to death for passing out christian literature. It's TRUTH vs LIES. Where do you stand? With Jesus or with liars, wherever they may be found. HE wasn't afraid of someone's PC "sensibilities" : Lawyers, LIARS, pharisees, hypocrites. Those 2 women gave their very LIVES for the TRUTH, as HE did, on the cross...
Of course, for the truth. Have put my life on the line for it a number of times.
But there are ways to stand for truth hereon that will allow you to continue to do so. And ways that won't.
JimRob quite reasonably and honorably expects and requires us to treat fellow FREEPERS with at least a surface civility. That's not a bad standard and goal for fellow conservatives.
But we can certainly still fiercely defend the truth--as long as we don't make it personal to another FREEPER.
I don't like the willful blindness, seeming lying; wholesale distortions and untruths that are often spread about here--often seemingly from shallow stupid ignorance and stubborn pride. But I can only speak the truth in love--ofetn enough in fierceness and love and ask God to deal with the jerky stuff.
Just as I can't be bothered taking the time to prove or disprove your B.S.,
= = = =
Reviewing the last umpteen posts, I notice you're also not going to bother answering those very inconvenient but simple questions below. I understand. I'm not up to some tasks either. Though I try and avoid blaming others for my lack.
1. How is it that the pranksters with boards on ropes manage a very complicated large circle to precise measurements with microwaved plant nodes in 2 hours?
Enquiring minds wish to know, oh great crop circle expert.
2. How is it that the crop circles with the microwaved plant nodes; the increased microfine iron particles and increased magnetism crop up in record time
WITHOUT ANY
tracks by any humans into the whole field in the time during which the circle was made???
Enquiring minds wish to know, oh great crop circle expert.
Ho Hum! Same old bunkum from you.
Thanks for the wonderfully unscientific falsehood.
You should be ashamed every time the word Scientific or Unscientific passes your lips.
:)
They could be afraid of us because it only takes 2 keys each in China, Russia, and us to make things burn up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.