To: SunkenCiv
That "forty" sounds like a worse problem than the centipede's.
Unless the "forty" refers to some other designation that doesn't require rowers' benches in the rigging!
4,000 rowers sounds more like banks of forty oars, rather than forty banks.
2,000 per side, divide by 40 = 50, to be divided by the number of banks, minus X reserve rowers.
Maybe 2 sets of oarsmen, giving 5 banks of forty 5-man oars? That still sounds unwieldy,and makes for a loooong sweep for the inside-end oarsman. Could he even run back & forth fast enough to keep the stroke???
Any other thoughts on what exactly the "forty" be be designating?
5 posted on
07/25/2004 8:25:47 PM PDT by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: ApplegateRanch
It must have been a complex design. :') Alas, it hasn't survived (that we know of -- perhaps time will tell otherwise?) and it was unique. And there probably never were any drawn plans. (': A "forty" would be 100 rowers per level... yeah, complicated. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list (alt)
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
7 posted on
07/25/2004 9:14:34 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson