[bigbob]

So what? It’s a theory, lots of people agree and disagree with every theory. Nature of the beast.

[Sopater]

So what? It’s a theory...

To many, it's much much more than that.

[ml/nj]

So what? It’s a theory, lots of people agree and disagree with every theory. Nature of the beast.

Do you really think "lots" of people disagree with atomic theory? Get a grip. Darwinian Evolution is a crock. This doesn't mean that Genesis is correct but only that Darwinian Evolution is not.

ML/NJ

[Nifster]

Since there is no experiment that can disprove, let alone prove, it is not a theory. It was observational opinion. Even a theory requires more

[freedumb2003]

You do not know what a Scientific Theory is so you should probably not opine on the science.

[BTCM]

Well said, all you flat earth folks.

[BrandtMichaels]

A theory is only as good as it’s predictions. Evolution fails to explain so many features and uses circular logic is claiming the age of the dirt give the age of the fossils and vice verse, can’t have it both ways! No explanation for Mt. St. Helens, for polystrate fossils, for carbon-14 found in dinosaur bones, etc.

Below is a link coming up on only 40 years old with proven predictions and explanations that agree with the Biblical record. Most of us don’t have the time to read 350+ pages of this free online book so I heartily endorse watching the video links because they’ll explain it in a way that words and pictures simply cannot:

Center for Scientific Creation
https://www.creationscience.com/

[DungeonMaster]

So what? It’s a theory, lots of people agree and disagree with every theory. Nature of the beast.

It's not the "theory" of evolution it's the "anecdotes" of evolution. There is no math what so ever to support the anecdotes.