How can there be a trial if the shooter hasn’t been charged?
The story is, the sheriff refuses to charge him, because he says the shooter was in compliance with the law.
Now, not withstanding all the political talk, the man wasn’t charged. Maybe with enough political pressure he will be, as happened to George Zimmerman.
So no trial, no jury selection, no verdict.
Yes. Good point. However that situation could change.
and to that point, the DA should definitely opt NOT to charge him as the outcome will most likely be the same as GZ; not guilty. Especially since this attack was caught on video and in most (sane) minds, the thug viciously attacked the other guy and was it was a justified kill.
I do find it a bit interesting that we’re really not hearing anything about this case from anyone in an official capacity. It makes me wonder if the thug, along with his very long criminal record, was illegally carrying his own weapon.