Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is The Second Amendment Worth Dying For?
The Federalist ^ | February 19, 2018 | John Daniel Davidson

Posted on 02/19/2018 6:53:53 AM PST by Sopater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Sopater

LOL! The scary part is some wouldn’t see the humor in that anymore.

It’s like the speed limit analogy. How slow is slow enough to prevent the MOST deaths?

Leaving the freaking car in the garage.

Which, BTW, driverless cars are all about. Taking our GREAT American freedom away. After guns.

Washington Post says America’s love affair with cars is over.

They can pull my COLD DEAD HANDS off of my Dodge Challenger, hollowed out muffler for speed, steering wheel. :)


21 posted on 02/19/2018 7:05:10 AM PST by dp0622 (The Left should know saying Syrian rebels in anost back in Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

The Second Amendment is an acknowledgement that life is dangerous, that people are sinners, and that your safety is your responsibility.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well said


22 posted on 02/19/2018 7:06:16 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

23 posted on 02/19/2018 7:06:39 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

If we didn’t have the Gun Control Act of 1968 , 911 would have NEVER Happened, half the passengers would have been armed and the hijackers would have been shot!


24 posted on 02/19/2018 7:08:30 AM PST by eyeamok (Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

An awful lot of people HAVE died for the 2nd Amendment, and the Constitution.

The fact is, were it not for the 2nd Amendment, America would have dissolved years ago. It’s the “wall” that protects the people from a tyrannically government.

Those who would-be tyrants cannot figure out how to get around, or over this “wall”. But the shark has been jumped...and by sheer virtue of HAVING the amendment, prevents anyone from taking the right away.

The more “shootings” they can generate, in places like schools, etc., the more chance (they figure) they’ll have to abolish it. In a perfect, Dr. Suess world, that might be true, but the rights, and the guns, are too numerous, and too embedded.

I would be like the final level of “Doom” if the government tried such a foolish endeavor.


25 posted on 02/19/2018 7:08:58 AM PST by FrankR (An armed society is a polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“Have Gun, Will Travel”


26 posted on 02/19/2018 7:13:08 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Without guns, we won't be able to protect ourselves from the left:

Anarchist Terrorism

27 posted on 02/19/2018 7:13:36 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“That doesn’t mean that private militias should have tanks and missile launchers...”

Why not? In the defense of Charleston Harbor in June, 1776, Col. Moultrie loaned his cannons to the South Carolina militia. He had the cannons stored in his barn. Those cannons defeated and turned back the British warships that tried to invade Sullivan Island.

Stupid liberals don’t know history.

I don’t know many who know how to operate a tank, but I’m sure we could learn. Give us tanks. And mortars. And RPGs.


28 posted on 02/19/2018 7:13:57 AM PST by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

How can the left expect us to surrender our arms when, in the next breath, they threaten our lives for our beliefs?


29 posted on 02/19/2018 7:21:54 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I used to be an internal process reengineering guy at a telecomm company I worked at. When we would go around and start looking at a problem, we would ask people what the cause was. Although I did not keep statistics, it was almost always NOT what the employees thought the cause was—but usually something completely different.

We used to have an excercise called the five whys. You would ask “why does this happen?” And when they gave the reason you would ask again. Go back 5 levels. THAT is your root cause.

Try getting ANYONE to sit through that thought exercise. It’s not easy.


30 posted on 02/19/2018 7:22:04 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

TOP line of my home page...

“THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NOT BE NEEDED UNTIL THEY TRY AND TAKE IT”. Thomas Jefferson


31 posted on 02/19/2018 7:27:58 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98)""Assume this is preceded by 'there is somebody somewhere who will say'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
We used to have an excercise called the five whys. You would ask “why does this happen?” And when they gave the reason you would ask again. Go back 5 levels. THAT is your root cause.

Try getting ANYONE to sit through that thought exercise. It’s not easy.


I'm a quality manager for a medical device manufacturer. I am intimately familiar with the 5-Why root cause investigation process, as well as the difficulties in getting others to actually follow it. I share in your pain.
32 posted on 02/19/2018 7:28:39 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Without guns (2nd amendment) one side or the other would not exist. Whichever side was in power would be able to shred the constitution as they saw fit. The right to free speech would go first. However, you would retain your right to a speedy trial. About 10 seconds is you were lucky.

Even if you were on the side holding power, you might be expendable on a whim. A few people North Korea may serve as an example here...

In short, without the 2nd amendment you might as well use the rest of the documents as toilet paper.

What about this don’t the sheeple understand?


33 posted on 02/19/2018 7:29:27 AM PST by Bitman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

America spoke loud and clear concerning how they feel about the 2nd amendment during the 8 treasonous years of the Hussien regime.


34 posted on 02/19/2018 7:30:04 AM PST by Envisioning (Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
The disarmists need to decide whether or not “gun-control” is worth dying for ...


35 posted on 02/19/2018 7:30:34 AM PST by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“Is The Second Amendment Worth Dying For?”......

When I joined the U.S. Navy I, like millions before and after me, KNEW what we faced yet we still accepted that potential. I accepted that possibility then and stand by it today!

Here’s the agreement I made for our country. (To save you time looking it up, It goes like this)...

(a) Enlistment Oath.— Each person enlisting in an armed force shall take the following oath:
“I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

It varies slightly between commissioned officers and enlisted but the agreements are the same.


36 posted on 02/19/2018 7:31:12 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Is the 2nd Amendment worth dying for?

Without the 2nd, there will be no 1st Amendment..... or any others IMHO. Isn’t that the plan?


37 posted on 02/19/2018 7:31:57 AM PST by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis , Totalitarians & other Democrats: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Living as a free man is dangerous but not as dangerous as living under a powerful government not restraint by rules, laws or customs.


38 posted on 02/19/2018 7:41:32 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Leftists always count on the military and police to be their henchmen for disarmament when the time for it finally arrives.

We used to laugh at that thought. Sadly, as our Post-Christian nation ages and those who have good moral consciences retire or die off - they are being replaced by those who are soulless, guiltless, maniacal, and downright evil (you may refer to them as Millennials).

It’s eventually going to happen unfortunately. The pic above the Travis posted says it all.


39 posted on 02/19/2018 7:42:33 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal (This country & world is living on borrowed time (Luke 17:26-27))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
Washington Post says America’s love affair with cars is over.

They can pull my COLD DEAD HANDS off of my Dodge Challenger, hollowed out muffler for speed, steering wheel. :)


I hear that!!! I was having a friendly discussion with some co-workers one time, not at all intending to cross the limits of political or ideological barriers, when the subject of public transit came up. I stated that I actually preferred the freedom of having my car right outside, and that I would choose not to use public transit, even if it was convenient for my commute. My co-workers (two of them) both responded that if public transit was fixed, that I would use it. I said "No, I wouldn't", and they said "yes, you would". This went back and forth a couple of times and then I could see that all of us were starting to get a bit stirred up. I was actually surprised at how insistent these other people were that I would choose their method of transportation (with my shared expense, of course), rather than simply allowing each to choose their own method. I tell you, I'm with you on that statement regarding your Dodge Challenger. One of the primary means of exercising my liberty is the ability to get in my car and go anywhere I want, whenever I want, without having to check in with anyone.
40 posted on 02/19/2018 7:42:53 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson