Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Christians Supposed to Be Communists?
NYT ^ | David Bentley Hart

Posted on 11/06/2017 5:34:46 AM PST by NorseViking

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Jim Noble

Some monasteries traditionally worked on a “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs,” basis. It worked to a degree, in as much as they had taken vows of poverty...but even in such cases, I believe there was some barter commerce or outside sales of goods and services to surrounding communities. Also, such systems worked because they were God-centered, which is the antithesis of Marxist communism.


21 posted on 11/06/2017 5:54:38 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

No. I give to you is Christian. I take from you for the greater good is commie.


22 posted on 11/06/2017 5:55:29 AM PST by ichabod1 (Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

The “having all things in common” was a spontaneous out-flow of the new believers love for one another, and was from the heart and not dictated by any leaders.

It was from the inside, to the outward. This is what real Christianity is.

Marx & Engels read the book of Acts, and reading it with atheistic minds (without the interpretation by the Holy Spirit) liked what they saw, and said, “Wouldn’t it be great if everyone did that?” Yes it would.

So they devised an evil system, run by corrupt men, to FORCE everyone to do what love did in Acts.

Externally forced from the outside. This is not love - it is slavery - and theft.

Communism - and every other cult - is the result of what man’s mind does with scripture without light (revelation) from the Holy Spirit.

The communists also got the great idea of their cell groups from Acts, where saints met not in a church building (a concept that didn’t appear until the 2nd or 3rd century AD), but “house to house”......a practice that was key to the “spontaneous expansion of the church” (search Roland Allen on Amazon) and the upsetting of the world in the first century - and mostly lost to today’s church.

Interestingly, the “having all things in common” did not last, and never appears again in the NT. It was tried by the first settlers of our nation - and abandoned as it totally failed....as it was forced externally, and not from love for one another.


23 posted on 11/06/2017 5:56:48 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Agreed, but technically these were not the words of Jesus (as in the gospels).

As the Bible distinguishes between Father, Son and Holy Spirit, it is best that we do so as well.........


24 posted on 11/06/2017 5:58:26 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Under the Rule of Benedict, no one was allowed to starve but if you did not work you did not get meat. Nor beer nor wine I would presume.


25 posted on 11/06/2017 5:58:26 AM PST by ichabod1 (Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
No!
26 posted on 11/06/2017 5:58:44 AM PST by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Communism was tried at Jamestown and Plymouth Colony in early 1600's with devastating results. Source 1 Source 2 Source 3
27 posted on 11/06/2017 5:58:48 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

https://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19370319_divini-redemptoris.html


28 posted on 11/06/2017 5:59:51 AM PST by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

I haven’t read the article but I’ve read lots from the author who is brilliant and one of the finest philosophical minds alive. He has commented in the past about the murderous Communist regimes. Still, maybe he’s read a bit too much Terry Eagleton who has for a long time tried to reconcile Christianity and Communism. But it can’t be done, at least without ignoring human nature and history.


29 posted on 11/06/2017 6:03:29 AM PST by JusPasenThru (It is OK to be white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

The first Christians were “voluntary” “communists”. It was a voluntary thing within the overall non-communist culture. And it was not particularly successful, apparently.

Communism is not voluntary.


30 posted on 11/06/2017 6:06:50 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

The question as posed is an oxymoron.

It’s like asking if a Police officer is supposed to be a criminal.

Communism requires the rejection of a supreme being as creator, making room for subjects to channel such loyalties and devotions to “the State”. “The State” (government) takes the place of God.


31 posted on 11/06/2017 6:10:25 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Thank you for noting that Communism is not voluntary.... Christians were never communists. In the Bible, out of need....the disciples shared everything. Many communities had to do that to survive. It was NOT a modern world by any means!


32 posted on 11/06/2017 6:10:37 AM PST by Ambrosia ( Conservative Independent- southern as grits, lived all over, and so opinionated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Truth!


33 posted on 11/06/2017 6:11:25 AM PST by Ambrosia ( Conservative Independent- southern as grits, lived all over, and so opinionated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ambrosia

Yes, they sold everything and shared as each had need. That is communistic in a way, kinda like the old hippie communes, but is not communism.


34 posted on 11/06/2017 6:12:40 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Arlis
Only 4 books in the New Testament, nothing in the Old, are from/ of Jesus, and those written by others, from memory, years later.

4 of 66 books.

Paul wrote 8 to 13 books of the New Testament, either himself or he dictated them.

35 posted on 11/06/2017 6:13:22 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Communism was tried at Jamestown and Plymouth Colony in early 1600's with devastating results.
Understandings about the meanings of words matter.
Although our modern socialists' promise of greater freedom is genuine and sincere, in recent years observer after observer has been impressed by the unforeseen consequences of socialism, the extraordinary similarity in many respects of the conditions under 'communism' and 'fascism'. As the writer Peter Drucker expressed it in 1939,
'the complete collapse of the belief in the attainability of freedom and equality through Marxism has forced Russia to travel the same road toward a totalitarian society of unfreedom and inequality which Germany has been following. Not that communism and fascism are essentially the same. Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion, and it has proved as much an illusion in Russia as in pre-Hitler Germany.’
That is, communism did not work in Russia, but although the government accepted that as a reality, it did not admit it. Thus, it continued to call itself “communists” when in fact it was fascist. We think of Stalin, Mao, et al as communist - but where the rubber meets the road, all “communists” are fascists.

36 posted on 11/06/2017 6:13:44 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

https://amazingbibletimeline.com/blog/q1_bible_who_wrote/

PLEASE use facts, as listed in the Bible timeline. All of the books used in the Bible are Holy Spirit inspired, the real author.


37 posted on 11/06/2017 6:17:21 AM PST by Ambrosia ( Conservative Independent- southern as grits, lived all over, and so opinionated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

The backbone core belief of communism and socialism is atheism. So no.


38 posted on 11/06/2017 6:18:36 AM PST by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

Christians serve God.

Not government.

Leave it to the New York Times to think that government is god.


39 posted on 11/06/2017 6:22:24 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ambrosia

Point being... If we are going to claim that the 4 Gospels, though written by others, from memories, years later, or that the Old Testament or any of the other writers of the NT were inspired by the Holy Spirit, we have to give Pauls writing the same authority, as it was written by the same inspiration of the same Holy Spirit.


40 posted on 11/06/2017 6:29:14 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson