Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump Tweets There Will Be NO Change To Your 401(k)!
IWB ^ | Ruby Henley

Posted on 10/23/2017 7:11:58 AM PDT by davikkm

If you are considered a “middle class worker,” you are about to be sucker-punched by a Republican proposal to alter the treatment of 401(k) contributions, which could make it much harder for you to save.”

I am happy to report today President Trump just tweeted there will be NO change to the 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan in his Tax Reform.  

“There will be NO change to your 401(k). This has always been a great and popular middle class tax break that works, and it stays!”

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 401k; tax; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: DoodleDawg

Oh, ye of little faith. How about I send you a mustard seed? I’ve got a stash. :-)


21 posted on 10/23/2017 7:27:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The fact that it only effects 2 wealthy states tells the rest of the story.

Two states my behind. It affects everyone who itemizes in any state with income taxes, property taxes, or sales taxes.

22 posted on 10/23/2017 7:27:21 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Trump isn't writing the tax bill, Ryan and McConnell and Co. are. The President will sign what they send him. And last report was that the 401k cap was being discussed.

Which is why, I both called and emailed to McConnell and Rand Paul's offices this morning. We need HIGHER limits on 401k contributions, not lower.

MANY companies have done away with traditional retirement plans, using 401k's as an excuse. The result is, for a LARGE number of Americans, 401ks are their primary (or only) source of retirement savings. Given the shaky status of Social Security, one would think they'd be happy to see Americans actively saving for their own retirement. sheesh...

23 posted on 10/23/2017 7:29:45 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Oh, ye of little faith. How about I send you a mustard seed? I’ve got a stash. :-)

Faith can move mountains, but history tells you a lot more. Trump will sign what they send him.

24 posted on 10/23/2017 7:29:50 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Well, if by some miracle, what those expletives-deleted on the Hill send the POTUS is a good deal for the country, I won’t have a problem with the prez signing it. :-)


25 posted on 10/23/2017 7:31:52 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Good call. I believe 401s have been for chumps compared to defined pension plans but they are all we have now. Better leave them alone.

A better idea would be the penny plan and just cutting spending.


26 posted on 10/23/2017 7:32:13 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Well I DO want a change to 401(k)’s. I want unlimited contributions of earned income for anyone.

What's stopping you from saving the excess outside of the 401(k)?

-PJ

27 posted on 10/23/2017 7:32:23 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; Mariner
This is a named primary source, and how you cut through the manipulative elitist media.

There will be NO change to your 401(k). This has always been a great and popular middle class tax break that works, and it stays!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 23, 2017


28 posted on 10/23/2017 7:33:00 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Nobody can retire on that. It takes a minimum of 25% of gross income invested at 6% to successfully retire in 40 years.


29 posted on 10/23/2017 7:33:30 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Gee, I’m paying $11K in state and local taxes, and my income is only $75K! I pay $3K income tax, $8K property tax.


30 posted on 10/23/2017 7:33:37 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Well, that would really depend on your income. If you make $400K, and invest $100K every year, you’re going to have plenty of money in far less than 40 years.


31 posted on 10/23/2017 7:35:06 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“For millions of us who live in high tax states, this bill will cream us.”

It is supposed to.
Those of us in low-tax states are subsidizing that deduction.
If you and others begin to feel the pain, and the actual costs of runaway Democrat spending policies, perhaps you and others will finally stand up against it.


32 posted on 10/23/2017 7:35:32 AM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

I first thought he made up this “threat” just so he could hang in on Congress and come out saying he would not allow it to happen.


33 posted on 10/23/2017 7:36:24 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
Wage earners don't pay Social Security taxes on anything above $127,200....that's insane.

What's insane is, how fast that cap has been increasing. Just 5 years ago, it was $110k.

Meanwhile, there has been no corresponding increase in the SS payments received. SS is already generating NEGATIVE RETURNS for people paying the maximum. Increasing the cap just makes it MORE negative.

Federal Income taxes are losing their effectiveness in wealth re-distribution since... nearly half of Americans already pay NOTHING. For a large number, they actually get money BACK, rather than pay anything. Now, THAT... is insane.

34 posted on 10/23/2017 7:37:00 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

If you earn well you should retire well.


35 posted on 10/23/2017 7:38:40 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

My state gets back less than 70 cents for every dollar we pay in Federal tax. Some states get several dollars back. It is the high tax states who are subsidizing them.


36 posted on 10/23/2017 7:39:21 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: the_boy_who_got_lost
That's assuming you contribute the maximum starting in your 20s.

Most people nowadays are awash in debt (college, their kids' college, weddings, cars, all things whose prices went through the roof because of women entering the workforce coupled with the widespread use of credit.

Not to mention that 401(k)s get taxed when you retire: and as the govt. continues to run out of money, look for the tax rate on withdrawals to go through the roof.

37 posted on 10/23/2017 7:39:50 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

>>Who can retire on $5,500 a year savings contributions?<<

The limit is $18,000 with $6,000 catchup ($24K a year for 50+).

Where did you get the idea there was a $5,500 cap?


38 posted on 10/23/2017 7:40:44 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Every Californian who supported "sanctuary state" has blood and ashes on his/her hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

I read that tweet. He said nothing about state and local tax deductions being preserved. Also nothing about charitable deductions.


39 posted on 10/23/2017 7:41:52 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I want access to it penalty-free before 59 & 1/2


40 posted on 10/23/2017 7:42:09 AM PDT by petercooper ("Democrats are on a collusion course with destiny in 2018." -- Bill Mitchell 5/26/17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson