Posted on 06/13/2017 4:44:51 AM PDT by davikkm
The D.C. Political class....they care not about country or countrymen. They care about their power
Globalism is the enemy.
Economic Nationalism is the cure.
What is TTP?
Not going to give the blog the hits to find out.
TTP comes from Trans Pacific Partnership (somehow?).
No mystery here. Neber has been..It’s the Elites vs. The People. My money’s on the Elites.
NOTE WELL: few, if any, of the RCEP and TPP countries contributed to the buck-raking Clinton Foundation. Looks like the Clintons and Obama divvied up the globe so that each have their own countries in order to collect big buck foundation donations, honorarium, consultancies, and int'l insider business deals.
==============================================
WIKI REFERENCE: Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a proposed free trade agreement (FTA) between the ten member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam) and the six states with which ASEAN has existing FTAs (Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand). RCEP negotiations were formally launched in November 2012 at the ASEAN Summit in Cambodia.
==================================================
The trade deal giveaway is a huge scam...best examined against the backdrop of Obama's two tax-exempt foundations (that we know of).
THE FACTS ARE THESE Obama's priming the pump for donations to his two Foundations. All of it---TPA and TPP--Obama's immigration suck-ups---his non- action WRT ISIS, IRAN---are best understood against the backdrop of Obama's future plans as an ex-president----more specifically, his two Foundations (two that we know of).
The aforementioned entities control billions of dollars---and Obama is lying-in-wait for his share.
Just the other day--Obama proudly bragged that today, once again, the US is the most respected country on earth.
So it doesnt matter Putin continues his invasion of Ukraine....
Or that China knows it can continue grabbing key sea areas, building vast artificial islands on which to plant its flag (and weapons). Or that Bashar al-Assad is back to using chemical weapons, because Obama won't enforce his own red line."
As for Iran: Its already breaking the interim US nuclear deal by building enriched-uranium stockpiles far larger than it promised. Iraq? In the same town-hall, Obama talks of how we were able to end two wars."
=========================================
Obama learned from the Clintons how to get a big payday for his two foundations: look on w/ approval even if countries invade and depopulate.....and never e-v-e-r utter a discouraging word e-v-e-r.
Maybe even shake hands w/ foreign tyrants to get mining permits and million dollar honorariums as Clinton did in Kazakhstan.
If the Republicans were smart they would go balls to the wall to implement Trump’s plans. After four years of successes, Trump would just get bored and hand it off to Pence.
If I needed the answer to anything I sure wouldn’t get it from your idiotic blog.
Just more proof of the Uniparty... Remove the 17th Amendment, the Uniparty goes away in one election cycle
Globalization of the US economy ends instantly
I have called and emailed my Senators asking that they remove McCain from his committee appointments. First, for global Trump-bashing, and second, for being completely non compos mentis at the Comey hearing.
Writer should have typed TPP. No editing these days.
That is the safe bet. The US experiment in self-government was an anomoly, and lasted about 150 years. The people are no match for the wits, power and cunning fielded by the elites.
Thanks for the graphic/information. BTTT!
Did anyone actually believe that the people could elect a non-traditional outsider and send him to DC and there would be a love-fest around the guy?
That is just crazy.
He threatens them ALL. That is why he gets minimal support from the Republicans and zero support from the Dems.
Why Republicans are still bashing Trump? The answer is quite simple, particularly if you talk a look through the past couple of decades of history.
Congress LIKES having a hobbled or emasculated President. They then get to be in charge. Congress continually tries to weaken the Executive branch of government.
They tried to weaken Reagan, but his strength of character and persistence made him consistently relevant. People liked him, he knew it, and he was able to go over the heads of Congress because of it.
They impeached, but didn’t convict Clinton, making him a lame-duck. Prior to that, Clinton also was popular with a wide swath of the population. Through his own actions, he destroyed this goodwill, and the ability to truly lead.
They began the destruction of GWB early, but the 9/11 attacks made him nearly invincible at home and abroad - until the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. He, too, was attacked - concerted efforts by the press, the global elitists, and the Dems. He spent 3/4ths of his last term weak, and on defense.
Obama was a more difficult challenge - they couldn’t go after him directly, or be banded racists. And he was popular with the Dem base, and solidified and energized the African-American voters. So they didn’t actively attack him, but they ignored him. He was useful when they needed to put a face on key socialist (oops - Democrat) policies, like “Obamacare” that the left had been lusting for since LBJ. But otherwise, he was ignored by congressional leaders.
So whether it was Boehner or Pelosi (and now Ryan) in the house, or Reid or McConnell in the Senate, the Congress wants to run things, and barely permit the President to be a figurehead. Trump is trying to break through this stranglehold like Reagan, and what you’re witnessing is Congressional push back.
That’s a fact.
Trump was a third party candidate who ran as a Republican.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.