Even though his paper was extensively foot noted with all the proper references - the fact that he did not include quotation marks convicts him of some form of academic plagiarism.
Clark: The blah object blah was shown to him by XYX (1);
Academic: “The” blah “object” blah “was shown to him by XYX” (1).
Which is more readable?
The seriousness of the charge provides the convicting evidence ...
Plaigiarism didn’t prevent biden from becoming VP
Even though his paper was extensively foot noted with all the proper references - the fact that he did not include quotation marks convicts him of some form of academic plagiarism.
He didn’t include quotes because he wasn’t supposed to. Every school/professor has their own way of doing footnotes/quotes. He did it the way he was supposed to, and the school has said he did.