=============================================================
Posted on 03/04/2017 8:37:05 AM PST by 198ml
=============================================================
Why some on this board continue to attack Mark Levin is beyond me.
It is an absolute fact that Levin’s constant attacks on Trump during the campaign have not proven true. Trump has done more for conservatism in one month than Bush did in 8 years. That is a fact.
Forgive us if we are leery of Levin. He always sounds bombastic, but his rants against Trump during the primary and even after were downright hateful - and they have been disproven by the actions of Trump.
I was a huge fan of Levin, but he burned the bridge - not me. I think many of us had some skepticism of Trump at the beginning and that is okay, but he won us over with action and continues to do so. Levin never backed off and frankly most of his blanket judgments (outside of open trade) have been disproven by Trump across the board.
NSA “wiretaps” at the TeleCom level. Sweeps won’t find them.
My point exactly. Sessions recused himself from “Russian interference” coordinated with Trump potential cases. He did not recuse from cases involving true collusion of the Russians with the Iranian payoff money and obamaumao’s complete abuse of FISA warrants to spy on a private citizen and TRULY try to influence US elections—ie. to help Hitlery.
He can ‘un-recuse’ himself with the narrowing of definition of what he has stated. New evidence, new rules. Reminds me of the scene from “Tombstone” when Wyatt Earp yells “you tell em I’m coming”. This weekend should be one of many re-orders of adult diapers by pelosi, schumer et. al. since they pushed the narrative lie too far.
My point being, if they needed to use others/outsiders (TELCOM) to conduct electronic surveillance of Trump, then more folks were in the loop, and more folks are fully aware of what occurred, with accompanying paper trails etc.
I share your sentiments. I used to like Levin, but he ultimately was too wedded to the establishment although certainly less than others.
Mark has to shed his relish for bombing things and never questioning the military and its use for globalist interests which are counterproductive to US interests. True, the military is largely composed of patriots, but some are deep into the deep state, especially those at high levels and in the intel branches.
Mark needs to aknowledge the realty of the move towards one world government and the degree to which politicians and bureaucrats have been fatally compromised.
If Mark has changed his tune on some of this, great, but I haven’t listened to him on a regular basis since 2012.
Trump must investigate Obama’s ‘unparalleled’ wire-tapping & ‘police-state tactics’
AND
PUT GENERAL FLYNN IN CHARGE OF THE INVESTIGATION. BOOOOOM.
I think I read this morning some NSA guy blew the whistle.
I think many of us had some skepticism of Trump at the beginning and that is okay, but he won us over with action and continues to do so. Levin never backed off and frankly most of his blanket judgments (outside of open trade) have been disproven by Trump across the board.
Is it still OK?
OK, to hold Trump to the conservative, the constitutional values that I hold?
I support Trump 100%, but I’m not blind or a sycophant that will excuse every Trump action or statement. Bush was great, now he’s not so great, McCain/Palin?, that’s the ticket, Romney?
WTF?
Ronald Reagan spent his “40 days” and more in the desert, and crystallized his message for conservationism, the Constitution, human nature and God. Donald Trump hasn’t even read the first page of Reagan’s life.
Trump has won over the masses of real Americans and I get that. He is attacking the media and I cheer him on at every step.
Trump isn’t our savoir that is without fault and it would be beneficial to this Conservative forum to recognize this fact.
“Obama would know if the accusation was true or not. If not true they would really fight back. If true, they will leave it to the media to defend him.”
This is really kind of funny in a way. Obama us guilty of so much other sh** that he can’t really come out and directly defend himself on this accusation, otherwise his statements could cost him.
There is also the emerging scandal of Obama diverting government settlements and penalty judgements from the Treasury where they belong, to seditious Leftist groups like BLM and La Raza.
Then there is the use of Freddie and Fannie money, that is money stolen from private investors, used to prop up 0-care.
When it comes to 0bama, Trump has a target rich environment.
Trump should have the DOJ investigate.....Oh, I forgot, Sessions just recused himself of any campaign investigations.
He - and anyone defending him - can kiss my ass.
It is okay to hold Trump to account with your principles. Absolutely.
However, much of what Levin said repeatedly about Trump has not proven true. Trump is doing more to advance conservatism than anyone since Reagan. That is a fact for me. Will I like everything? No. However, on the scorecard it is undeniable that Trump is advancing conservative issues we care about. It is also undeniable that Trump is 1000% better than Hillary for conservatism. Levin never seemed to grasp the latter point in all his tirades against Trump. That fact, more than anything, is what I am upset with Levin about.
I won’t be a blind sycophant to any person and I am glad you will not either. While I understand your sentiment regarding some of our fellow posters, I don’t count myself among them. Conservatism for me is grounded in logic and reason ala Buckley. I believe that pragmatism is a necessary virtue for reason. That point was lost on Levin at the point it became obvious to most of us that the only person who stood between Hillary and the Whitehouse was Trump. Levin went on a months long tirade against Trump with little mention of Hillary or the perilous position our nation was in if she won. I have been very pleased with Trump who has done what he promised and has done more to advance conservative principles than I thought he would or could. I don’t have a blind allegiance, but so far I certainly feel like “we the people” are winning.
Obama DOJ Funneled BILLIONS to Liberal Activist Groups
Fox News ^ | Mar 1, 2017 | Melissa Jacobs
Posted on 3/3/2017, 10:22:50 AM by Ray76
The Obama administration funneled billions of dollars to activist organizations through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme, according to congressional investigators.
Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3531084/posts
“4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.”
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/03/the-shadow-government-timeline/#more-129451
Understood.
Does Mark Levin support Trump today?
“IF this is true, why announce it and let the rats run for cover? Investigate as much as possible away from the press and line up your ducks before you announce it. Obummer is no longer president and could wind up in a cell next to Hilldabeast.”
If it’s true, does it matter that he said it now?
If it’s not true, Trump would be off the rails and the psycho liberals would have a point.
“I can not believe President Trump would toss this grenade if he could not back it up.”
I agree.
If it’s not true, Trump really hurt himself.
Everything before this has been noise.
This is throwing down.
I’m just worried that this whole thing is a fabrication to set up Trump to look like a paranoid Schitzoid. I hope there is solid concrete proof of these allegations otherwise it won’t bode well for the President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.