Can someone please articulate the substance of the alleged “Russian meddling”? I’ve seen so much blather thrown about it, but never a single shred of viable accusation that has any hope as courtroom evidence.
Yeah, Trump and his people talked to Russians. They probably did before becoming POTUS, seeing as he was the incoming leader of the world superpower, and highly influential leaders have an interest in at least casual chats with their upcoming peers.
What’s the alleged _problem_ here?
This is a gaslighting exercise. It forces people to supply missing actual facts and creates a ‘memory’. Enough memories over time forms a consensus, which leads to a opinion. It’s like trying to paint a landscape at night with no moon and only a flickering lantern.
The problem was instead of growing balls and telling Stuart Smalley to go piss up a rope a month ago in the first place, yesterday AG Sessions stuttered and stammered as he recused himself, turning a "nothingburger" into a smouldering fire.